On 2016-06-28 20:52, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> Is the feature described in this old thread still
> on a todo list?
Probably, together with maybe 200 other items. So the best way to get
this is to develop it yourself...
Regards
Daniel
--
Daniel Naber wrote:
> On 2015-10-11 11:58, Dominique Pellé wrote:
>
>> Would be possible to allow for several tags
>> in the same rule?
>
> I don't think it's very difficult. I could put it on my TODO list, but I
> cannot make any promises about when I have time for this.
>
> Regards
> Daniel
On 2015-10-11 11:58, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> Would be possible to allow for several tags
> in the same rule?
I don't think it's very difficult. I could put it on my TODO list, but I
cannot make any promises about when I have time for this.
Regards
Daniel
--
Hi
Would be possible to allow for several tags
in the same rule?
It seems that we can only give one.
I'd like to be able to use several (at least 2):
* one to make sure that part of regexp matches a postag
* another one to make sure that part of the regexp does not match a postag
I tried someth
