Ahh, I didn't realize I had to add angle brackets as well, the
postag="" works.
Thanks a lot!
Andriy
2014-08-18 2:50 GMT-04:00 Marcin Miłkowski :
> W dniu 2014-08-18 04:11, Andriy Rysin pisze:
>> On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
>>> On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote:
>>>
>>>
W dniu 2014-08-18 04:11, Andriy Rysin pisze:
> On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
>> On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote:
>>
>>> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being
>>> noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another
>>> word fol
On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote:
>
>> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being
>> noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another
>> word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb
On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote:
> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being
> noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another
> word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in
> exception but looks like this is not s
ibly be
matched.
Current solution looks ugly and although it works I'd like to make it
right. So the question is is there a reason why chunks are not
supported in exceptions? And if there's a reason we should not support
chunks in exceptions what's the best way to write a rule belo
