Done that.
You have
She wants you to goes there.
I've been trying to called you.
She is manipulating her father to gets her way.
He tried very hard to lifted the rock.
The rule I created flags the first and the third.
It wrongly flags only the last sentence here:
The calendar her eyes kept stray
Read the issue description on github. I added possible false alarms there.
Regards
Marcin
07-10-2013 11:11, "Kumara Bhikkhu" napisał(a):
> Thanks for trying to explain, Marcin. Like I said, I don't have a good
> head for this stuff. Examples work better for me. So, I think I'll get a
> better id
Thanks for trying to explain, Marcin. Like I
said, I don't have a good head for this stuff.
Examples work better for me. So, I think I'll get
a better idea when I see the false alarms. First,
I need to make the rule match the incorrect sentence.
Perhaps "a dictionary of phrasal verbs" wouldn'
Actually, you're trying to achieve something very difficult -- the
trouble is that we do no deep parsing, which would assign verb groups
correctly.
I created an issue for this to remind us about it:
https://github.com/languagetool-org/languagetool/issues/20
But unless we have a dictionary of p
Some more sentences it should flag:
* She is manipulating her father to gets her way.
* He tried very hard to lifted the rock.
The broken underlines are meant to indicate the
intended tokens. (Perhaps the "is" can be left out.)
Kumara Bhikkhu wrote thus at 06:49 PM 05-10-13:
Marcin MiÅ
Marcin MiÅkowski wrote thus at 06:19 PM 05-10-13:
This rule wouldn't make much sense anyway. You
will inevitably match patterns between verb
phrases if you don't have any conditions on the token before "to".
Let me try to wrap my head around this one.
I already made some improvements. What k
W dniu 2013-10-05 12:00, Kumara Bhikkhu pisze:
Daniel Naber wrote thus at 04:31 PM 05-10-13:
On 2013-10-05 09:21, Kumara Bhikkhu wrote:
> How do I indicate "zero or more token"?
> This doesn't work:
There's still a bug in our code, only "zero or one" currently works.
Your example should match
Daniel Naber wrote thus at 04:31 PM 05-10-13:
On 2013-10-05 09:21, Kumara Bhikkhu wrote:
> How do I indicate "zero or more token"?
> This doesn't work:
There's still a bug in our code, only "zero or one" currently works.
Your example should match zero or one token (max="1" is the default). If
On 2013-10-05 09:21, Kumara Bhikkhu wrote:
> How do I indicate "zero or more token"?
> This doesn't work:
There's still a bug in our code, only "zero or one" currently works.
Your example should match zero or one token (max="1" is the default). If
it doesn't, please post a complete example.
R
How do I indicate "zero or more token"?
This doesn't work:
kb
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profili
10 matches
Mail list logo
