[LARTC] htb ceiling

2002-04-04 Thread Gavin
Hello, I'm using HTB (through htb.init :) and it's nearly perfect, but the CEIL directive seems to have no effect. The relevant lines are: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 100 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 5Mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth1 parent

[LARTC] QOS

2002-04-04 Thread George Tsuladze
i want to priorize UDP on eth0 internal and eth1 external interfaces. which command i have to use? can u write me an example? ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] New IMQ device available

2002-04-04 Thread Julián Muñoz
> - Ingress support (egress qdiscs can be used for ingress traffic control!) Ehh, I can't believe it !! Yahgo ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] New IMQ device available

2002-04-04 Thread Patrick McHardy
Oops, forgot to reply to the list. On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Martin Devera wrote: > Also why there are four imqs ? I can't find way how to > direct packet to partiticular one The IMQ iptables target has an option --todev to specify to which imq device a packet should go. if it's not specified it

Re: [LARTC] New IMQ device available

2002-04-04 Thread Martin Devera
good work ;) Please change Devara=>Devera .. I also changed original page http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/imq.htm to mention your new one at beginning. Also why there are four imqs ? I can't find way how to direct packet to partiticular one devik On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Patrick McHardy wrote: >

Re: [LARTC] typo ?

2002-04-04 Thread Soulfly
"Mihai RUSU" wrote > Hi > > While reading the HOWTO (pdf downloaded and printed last night) I have > noticed a little strange thing. In the 9.2.1 chapter, explaining the > pfifo_fast qdisc, it is shown a TOS field mapping table and also it > appears a command line version: > > "The last column sh

[LARTC] New IMQ device available

2002-04-04 Thread Patrick McHardy
Hi! I've completed a pre-release of the new IMQ device. Changes include: - Multiple IMQ devices - Selection of what gets queued to which device is done using an iptables target, nothing gets queued be default - Ingress support (egress qdiscs can be used for ingress traffic control!) - Poss

Re: [LARTC] bandwidth allocation

2002-04-04 Thread Vincent AE Scott
Julián Muñoz([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:14:44PM +: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Vincent AE Scott wrote: > > > i have no experience with the products you mention, but there was a > > comparsion made recently on this list between PIX and linux advanaced > > routing features. The archi

Re: [LARTC] bandwidth allocation

2002-04-04 Thread Julián Muñoz
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Vincent AE Scott wrote: > i have no experience with the products you mention, but there was a > comparsion made recently on this list between PIX and linux advanaced > routing features. The archives are located here: > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/ I doesn't fin

Re: [LARTC] bandwidth allocation

2002-04-04 Thread Vincent AE Scott
simbo adeyemi([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:30:48AM -0800: > > pls, i'd like to perform traffic shapping and bandwidth allocation on my > linux server. > I want to be able to do everything that a device like packeteer > floodgate's)and cisco's PIX would do. > I am using linux redhat

[LARTC] bandwidth allocation

2002-04-04 Thread simbo adeyemi
pls, i'd like to perform traffic shapping and bandwidth allocation on my linux server. I want to be able to do everything that a device like packeteer floodgate's)and cisco's PIX would do. I am using linux redhat v 6.2. How do i go about this? lara _