Hi!
I'm trying to share a 64 kbits/s ISDN connection for FTP downloads and WWW.
FTP should slow down WWW a little a possible.
I tried HTB (with kernel 2.4.18) with the following (amongst other) settings:
$TC qdisc add dev $IF root handle 1: htb default 20
$TC class add dev $IF parent 1:
A rule like:
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j DROP
would do the trick. Kind of a sledgehammer solution, but it should block
everyone.
- Greg
-Original Message-
From: Ross Skaliotis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Brian
Cc: [E
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:24:10PM -0400, Jacob Elder wrote:
> > I'm trying to prioritize interactive traffic over other traffic on my 56k
> > dialup link. I wrote some chains to set the ToS in PREROUTING and OUTGOING,
> > and I'm usin
When you use NAT to route traffic from eth0 out to the internet, it flows
through the FORWARD table, bypassing the INPUT and OUTPUT tables
completely. You'll need to setup a rule in your firewall blocking access
using the FORWARD table.
-Ross Skaliotis
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Brian wrote:
>
> I ha
I have a iptables firewall version 1.2.5, I LOVE IPTABLES SO MUCH MORE
THINGS YOU CAN DO. I have a small network off my eth0 interface
192.168.0.X network and my ppp0 is my DSL connection, with the current
firewall how would I block someone going to the Internet from my eth0
interface. I have tri
Hi it seems as if there is something other throttling
the data - is not it the case that you tested the downloads
thru your 128k internet connection ? If yes then throttling is
done at other side of line. The try to set BAND to 110k for
example ...
devik
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Lumir Unzeitig wrote:
Hello,
I want to set up typical scenario:
entire bandwith (128kbps from ISP) to devide to 2 parts:
1\traffic from special source IP address
2\ rest
Each part should be capable of "borrowing" from the other in case of less
traffic on either side.
I set up according to the HTB manual using
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:24:10PM -0400, Jacob Elder wrote:
> I'm trying to prioritize interactive traffic over other traffic on my 56k
> dialup link. I wrote some chains to set the ToS in PREROUTING and OUTGOING,
> and I'm using a PRIO queue with three SFQ children:
PRIO works just fine - you p
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 12:37:14AM -0700, David Koski wrote:
> To clarify, doing a reverse DNS on me outside of the local network does not
> work. Are we on the same page? I think that is causing a problem receiving
> some mail also.
Might very well be. I sould advise contacting the administrat
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:09:14PM +0200, Jan Coppens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, I'm experimenting with ingress policing. Is it possible to
> attach multiple u32 filters to the same policer or attach one policer to
> multiple u32 filters? I would like to define a shared meter, so the rate
>
To clarify, doing a reverse DNS on me outside of the local network does not
work. Are we on the same page? I think that is causing a problem receiving
some mail also.
Thanks,
David
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 01:29:44 -0500
Greg Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll bet that's the right direction.
11 matches
Mail list logo