LARTC£¬hello£¡
I need a WFQ source code in Linux Traffic Control System for my implementation.
who can help me?
¡¡best regards!
Huang Xin Gang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
¡
htb's maximal tree depth is limited at compile time.
(The default is 4.)
please tell me how can i modify it.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
2002ÄêÊÀ½ç±ÈºÐÛ÷éÕ½ ÑÅ»¢Öйú¾Û½¹ÈÕº«
http://cn.fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/
___
Alexander Atanasov writes:
> > Again, no. It's perfectly possible for one queue to always have
> > length in range 99-101 and another to always have length 9-11 and
> > still be serving them both at the same rate. Just imagine that one
> > client sends 100 packets at once and the other sends
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Don Cohen wrote:
> Alexander Atanasov writes:
>
> > > I don't see why that should be the case. And I don't recall ever
> > > observing it. This adaptation time should be practically zero.
> > > There's no work in making the queues equal.
> >
> >When queues get ful
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> Hi,
> just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :)
>
> There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to
> consider IPs or ports.
> What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP
> adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ?
>
Alexander Atanasov writes:
> > I don't see why that should be the case. And I don't recall ever
> > observing it. This adaptation time should be practically zero.
> > There's no work in making the queues equal.
>
> When queues get full sfq have to drop packets and it must
> send les
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Don Cohen wrote:
> Alexander Atanasov writes:
> > > > Plaing with it gives interesting results:
> > > > higher depth -> makes flows equal slower
> > > > small depth -> makes flows equal faster
> > > > limit kills big delays when set at about
Dear all,
I copy a Ethloop script for tc script, but no response???
Does anyone know how to use ethloop?
Ethloop;
#1st parameter -- time in milliseconds from program start
#2nd parameter -- operation to do
#3rd parameter -- flow id
#4th parameter -- operation dependent
#
#e.g 5000 R 2 450
#
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Vladimir Trebicky wrote:
> Well, I took 0.2 version, I compiled it as a module - no problem.
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst
> - ok
> but then I started in one moment to upload (via eth1 of course) 3 scp's. The
> first 2 were uploading on ip A and the thir
Hi there!
This post is somehow connected with my other posts about problems with HTB. In fact -
in my case it can be problem of linux kernel :-/?
Ok, here is the hardware and software:
Linux Debian working on classic pentium 120MHz.
Kernel 2.4.18.
MLDonkey is working for some period of time.
OK - lets straight everything up! :-)
First of all: I did forget about the very first line of my config file - sorry for
that:
(I mean it was in my config file, but I forgot to paste)
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i ppp0 -j IMQ
--
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 12:27, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Paul,
> Off hand I would assume that your kernel was not compiled with
> multipath support. That's the only reason I can think of off hand why
> those commands would fail.
>
> Now if that is compiled into your kernel, then i
Paul,
Off hand I would assume that your kernel was not compiled with
multipath support. That's the only reason I can think of off hand why
those commands would fail.
Now if that is compiled into your kernel, then it could be a problem
with you trying to use a IP that your machine
Hi everyone,
I'm new to the list and I've got a couple of questions. I'm
following instructions here:
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1824/sam0201h/0201h.htm
for setting up a dual-connection (T1 & DSL) machine. My problems are:
1) ip route add default equalize doesn't work - I get:
>i
You set it on imq. But how did you set the IMQ ? IIRC the Patrick's
IMQ is able to shape both direction and I don't know which one
do you shape.
Also you set 1:10 to 70k and 1:20 to 10k So that you allow
to utilize link at 80k. It is bad becaue 1:1 is set to 70.
Is your connection (it uses some sp
why do you say it is set in both directions?
I dont think there is reason for doing that...
Anyway even if this is set for both directions it souldn't be any problem.
About connection itself: it is very common in Poland. It is something like DSL. It is
using phone lines, it is connected to comp
No. It would require tcp-qos cooperation.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Mancinelli Giovanni wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have some doubts about HTB algorithm:
> Is it possible to deny client connection when bandwidth is saturated ?
>
> I mean bandwidth manager manages 1Mbit and link is full, can I stop new
sorry for previous post. I have no idea what was the reason :-(. I am sure it was set
to 'plain-text', but I have changed email anyway...
---
hi there!
For weeks I am trying to set my network in such a way:
server (linux) is connected through ppp0 t
you set both directions to use the same htb. Am I right ? Which
kind of line, 11kBbs .. what is it ??
On 6 Jun 2002, josh wrote:
> hi there!
>
> For weeks I am trying to set my network in such a way:
>
> server (linux) is connected through ppp0 to internet. There is MLDonkey running on
>that an
Hello all,
I have some doubts about HTB algorithm:
Is it possible to deny client connection when bandwidth is saturated ?
I mean bandwidth manager manages 1Mbit and link is full, can I stop new
connection ?
can I guarantee a fixed minimum bandwidth to all connection already
established?
Than
Dear all,
I would to use HTB to create AF with drop priority.
Is there any methods to do that?
GRED is possible but is there any other methods.
Thanks you guy!
Patrcik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo
hi there!
For weeks I am trying to set my network in such a way:
server (linux) is connected through ppp0 to internet. There is MLDonkey running on
that and it is also Internet default gateway for my LAN. I want as fast access to the
Internet as there would be no MLDonkey running - I mean:
> From: Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion
> Hi,
> just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :)
>
> There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to
> consider IPs or ports.
> What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP
> adres
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 03:03:58PM +0200, alouini khalif wrote:
> hello
> ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
> the code bellow
> please, look at it, and if there is any mistake,
> would you like to indicate it to me
>
> packet arrive and we reach a seuil then wehave to
> I disagree that the goal is to make the subqueues the same length.
> The goal is to serve them with the same bandwidth (as long as they
> don't become empty.)
Not that you need backing-up, but I agree with you. SFQ is there to provide
near-fair queuing on a per-session basis. As modified, it
hello
ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
the code bellow
please, look at it, and if there is any mistake,
would you like to indicate it to me
if is ok, how can i write my pacth, i'm using red
hat 7.2(kernel2.4.7-10)
is it necessairely to write this pacth and also the
hello
ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
the code bellow
please, look at it, and if there is any mistake,
would you like to indicate it to me
if is ok, how can i write my pacth, i'm using red
hat 7.2(kernel2.4.7-10)
is it necessairely to write this pacth and also the
hello
ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
the code bellow
please, look at it, and if there is any mistake,
would you like to indicate it to me
if is ok, how can i write my pacth, i'm using red
hat 7.2(kernel2.4.7-10)
is it necessairely to write this pacth and also the
hello
ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
the attached file
please, look at it, and if there is any mistake,
would you like to indicate it to me
if is ok, how can i write my pacth, i'm using red
hat 7.2(kernel2.4.7-10)
is it necessairely to write this pacth and also the
> There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to
> consider IPs or ports.
> What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP
> adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ?
> It would solve both problems - fairnes between computers
> (IP) and between flows on than single computer
hello
ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
the attached file
please, look at it, and if there is any mistake, would
you like to indicate it to me
if is ok, how can i write my pacth, i'm using red hat
7.2(kernel2.4.7-10)
is it necessairely to write this pacth and also the
pacth fo
hello
ok,i wrote the EDP algorithm code as you can see in
the attached file
please, look at it, and if there is any mistake, would
you like to indicate it to me
if is ok, how can i write my pacth, i'm using red hat
7.2(kernel2.4.7-10)
is it necessairely to write this pacth and also the
pacth fo
Add RED on IMQ see http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/
and SFQ on network device or vice versa
send all incoming packets to imq
modprobe imq mumdevs=1
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $IN_DEV -j IMQ --todev 0
ip link set imq0 up
06.06.2002 14:21:55, "Jan Coppens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi
Did you read HTB user manual ?
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, [gb2312] hanhbnetfilter wrote:
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:10 rate
> 30kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:11 rate
> 10kbps ceil 100kbps bur
Well, I took 0.2 version, I compiled it as a module - no problem.
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst
- ok
but then I started in one moment to upload (via eth1 of course) 3 scp's. The
first 2 were uploading on ip A and the third was uploading on ip B. But all
those three threads wer
Hi,
just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :)
There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to
consider IPs or ports.
What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP
adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ?
It would solve both problems - fairnes between computers
(
Hi all,
Is there any implemented qdisc that combines the benefits of a SFQ with
those of a RED queue. Something like a FRED, CBT or DWRED?
thx,
Jan
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://
hi list,
this is my first posting in the list here. At the moment I am reading the
Advanced Traffic. How-To. perhaps some one can tell me how to realize
my idea.
We have a data-server which is used by different subnets in our company. now
I want wo put a linux-box in front the dataserver wh
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 01:42, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 5 Jun 2002, Alexander Brill wrote:
>
> > Whenever I try to 'readd' a route I receive an error and I can't figure
> > out why...
> >
> > # Add some routes
> > ip route add $EXT via $INT
> > ip route add prio 320 from $I
39 matches
Mail list logo
