[LARTC] Question on hashkey

Hi, I've been working on hashing in tc for a month. Since there are only a limited number of avaialbe example on hashing, I'll be appreciate if someone can my questions as follows: 1. tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip perent 1:0 \ prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \ match ip src 1.2.0.0/16 \ hashkey mask

Re: [LARTC] Question on hashkey

1. tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip perent 1:0 \ prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \ match ip src 1.2.0.0/16 \ hashkey mask 0x00ff at 12 \ link 2: It seems that the hashkey make can only applied to ip header. How can I use the marked number in a packet (using iptables) as the hashkey??? 2.By

[LARTC] Downloadable mail archive missing june 2002

Hi The downloadable mail archive is missing everything from 10/5 to 30/6: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q2.txt.gz Could someone fix this? Thanks Lars Munch ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LARTC] Problem with Kernel compilation

On Monday 12 August 2002 21:48, Claudio Aznar wrote: Hello list, I'm try to compile the new versión of Kernel (2.4.18) for IMQ support, and I don't find this option: Networking options --- IP: Netfilter Configuration ---IMQ target support Networking options --- IPv6: Netfilter

Re: [LARTC] Problem with Kernel compilation

I have in the kernel configuration the option Network device support ---IMQ (intermediate queueing device) support But not the other options... To activate this option is sufficient ? CA On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:59:17 +0200 Stef Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 12 August 2002

Re: [LARTC] Problem with Kernel compilation

On Monday 12 August 2002 22:19, Claudio Aznar wrote: I have in the kernel configuration the option Network device support ---IMQ (intermediate queueing device) support But not the other options... To activate this option is sufficient ? If you only want to enable the imq device, that's

Re: [LARTC] htb3 imq

Arindam Haldar wrote: hi Alex, thanx so much.. :) .. thanx to all my IMQ htb3 test rules are working ok.. the best part-- imq handling both in out traffic now.. :) I also had this setup, and i also thought of it as a cool thing :) but then Patrick told me, that it's not so clever: the

Re: [LARTC] Question on hashkey

Hi, Thanks for your reply. Does it mean that fw has implemented hashing implicitly?? Suppose I've the following fitler rules: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 handle 1 fw tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 handle 2 fw tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:

[LARTC] unsubscribe

Title: Message PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME ANY NEW E-MAIL with (LARTC) in the subject body. Regards! [EMAIL PROTECTED]