> I want to be able to specify actions for different classes of
> traffic in any of these four ways, and I'd like to use only
> HTB if possible:
>
> 1. No guranteed rate, No ceil
> 2. Guaranteed rate, No ceil
> 3. No guranteed rate, Ceil specified
> 4. Guaranteed rate, Ceil specified
What do you m
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:59:54PM -0300, Esteban Maringolo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing with tc, htb, and other QoS features on an old pc I have.
> The PC runs, by now, a shrinked version of Debian Woody, with patched
> versions of kernel 2.4.18 and iproute in order to support HTB.
>
>
Hi,
I want to be able to specify actions for different classes of
traffic in any of these four ways, and I'd like to use only
HTB if possible:
1. No guranteed rate, No ceil
2. Guaranteed rate, No ceil
3. No guranteed rate, Ceil specified
4. Guaranteed rate, Ceil specified
For types 2, 3 and 4 t
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:17:55PM +0200, Wojtek wrote:
| Jan Macek wrote:
| >Is there some way to make iproute2 log to syslog or to a file selected
| >packets?
|
| use the iptables or ipchains with --log switch
iptables does not have a --log switch. You must use the '-j LOG' target
instead.
-
Hello,
I'm playing with tc, htb, and other QoS features on an old pc I have.
The PC runs, by now, a shrinked version of Debian Woody, with patched
versions of kernel 2.4.18 and iproute in order to support HTB.
What i'm wondering is if with a AMD 100Mhz (stealed from a museum ;-),
Hello Stef!
Stef Coene schrieb:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 18:25, Nils Lichtenfeld wrote:
>> That was not my question. The listed items are not selectable as
>> modules. They can only be compiled into the kernel or turned off. I
>> list them again, they reside in the < QOS and/or fair queueing
On Thursday 29 August 2002 18:25, Nils Lichtenfeld wrote:
> Hi Stef!
>
> Stef Coene schrieb:
> >> Witch of the following options _NEED_ to be enabled? I ask, because
> >> the goal is to have the kernel as small as possible.
> >
> > Then use modules and load only the modules you need.
>
> That was
Hi Stef!
Stef Coene schrieb:
>> Witch of the following options _NEED_ to be enabled? I ask, because
>> the goal is to have the kernel as small as possible.
> Then use modules and load only the modules you need.
That was not my question. The listed items are not selectable as
modules. They can on
On Thursday 29 August 2002 17:40, Nils Lichtenfeld wrote:
> Hello there!
>
> Using Kernel 2.4.19.
>
> The modules I intend to use are SFQ queue, HTB packet scheduler,
> Firewall based classifier and the U32 classifier.
>
> Witch of the following options _NEED_ to be enabled? I ask, because the
> g
Hello there!
Using Kernel 2.4.19.
The modules I intend to use are SFQ queue, HTB packet scheduler,
Firewall based classifier and the U32 classifier.
Witch of the following options _NEED_ to be enabled? I ask, because the
goal is to have the kernel as small as possible.
< QOS and/or fair queuei
On Thursday, 29 August 2002, at 16:15:04 +0300,
Alexander Trotsai wrote:
> Is snat /x -> 1IP equal to masquerade? If I want specify
> address for masquerade, could I use snat for this?
>
As far as I know (and from what iptables manpage says) MASQ is similar
to SNAT with just a single source IP a
On Thursday 29 August 2002 16:00, Robert Penz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > All you have to do is chaning r2q so quantum is smaller :)
>
> ok, I've done that, set r2q to 60, but still the same message, my problem
> is also that I don't know a class 10010
That's an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> All you have to do is chaning r2q so quantum is smaller :)
ok, I've done that, set r2q to 60, but still the same message, my problem is
also that I don't know a class 10010
now my qdisc line looks that way
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
On Thursday 29 August 2002 15:37, Robert Penz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm getting following messages in my log, don't know what I'm doing wrong.
> I have that messages on 2.419 and 20pre1
>
> first call of my TC script, after the boot
>
> Aug 29 14:30:0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm getting following messages in my log, don't know what I'm doing wrong.
I have that messages on 2.419 and 20pre1
first call of my TC script, after the boot
Aug 29 14:30:06 whitestar kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.6
Aug 29 14:30:06 w
> It works fine for me, although I haven't used CBQ previously so I can't
> comapre them. It just works for me, except the delays in interactive class
> are too long, even when the prio is 0 (highest) and the rate and ceil are
> maximum. Maybe CBQ is better in reducing the delays... Anybody solved
Jan Macek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there some way to make iproute2 log to syslog or to a file selected
> packets?
>
> I have a problem, that my packets dissapear somewhere, and I want to be
> sure if they get to the routing stage or not, and where do they get
> routed.
>
>
use the iptables or ipch
Hi all
Is snat /x -> 1IP equal to masquerade? If I want specify
address for masquerade, could I use snat for this?
--
Best regard, Alexander Trotsai aka MAGE-RIPE aka MAGE-UANIC
My PGP at ftp://blackhole.adamant.net/pgp/trotsai.key[.asc]
___
LARTC mai
On Thursday 29 August 2002 13:03, Roberto Campos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just want to know if HTB is alredy in stock kernel or if I have do
> recompile the kernel for it to work.
It will be in kernel 2.4.20.
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
On Thursday 29 August 2002 10:53, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
> hi,
>
> you give to all the clients all the bandwith or limited at 64k, but with
> different priorities.
>
> class parent 1: classid 1:5 htb rate 128kbit
> class parent 1:5 classid 1:1 htb rate 64kbit ceil 128kbit prio 1
> class parent 1
Jan Macek wrote:
> I have this situation:
>
> My machine debina, has three interfaces:
>
> eth1 212.126.24.129
> ppp0 10.2.0.1 (Point-to-Point: 212.31.242.98)
> nsc5 10.2.0.250 (Point-to-Point: 172.23.140.32)
>
>
> I want packets which come in through the nsc5 interface, to be FORWAR
Hi,
I just want to know if HTB is alredy in stock kernel or if I have do
recompile the kernel for it to work.
Thanks.
Roberto Campos
___
Meu Provedor Tecnologias e Informatica ltda.
Rua Camerino, 128 Gr. 302 - Centro
Rio de Janeiro -
hi,
you give to all the clients all the bandwith or limited at 64k, but with
different priorities.
class parent 1: classid 1:5 htb rate 128kbit
class parent 1:5 classid 1:1 htb rate 64kbit ceil 128kbit prio 1
class parent 1:5 classid 1:2 htb rate 64kbit ceil 128kbit prio 2
you put the client t
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:45, Stef Coene wrote:
> > The problem is that clients can have their bandwidths at maximum only if
> > they use a download accelerating software like DAP with multiple
> > symultanous threads. Using only one thread, a single download can reach
> > about 60% of the
24 matches
Mail list logo
