On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Don Cohen wrote:
> > > I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by
> > >
> > ip route add default nexthop via $CONN1_IP dev $ETHX weight $X \
> > nexthop via $CONN2_IP dev $ETHX weight $Y
>
> Note that this only shapes o
> > I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by
> > different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet
> > connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet
> > connections do NOT have equal bandwidth
> > How do I configure
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Joseph Watson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Every time I post to this list, I recieve non-deliverable responces such as
> the follow:
>
> nonexist mail account : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:46:12 +0800
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Rip pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 September 2002 01:07 am, Joseph Watson wrote:
> Hello,
>
Sorry I have the wrong list here :)
- --
Regards
Joseph Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9l92+ABydhMNsDgMRAp1vAJ9wUqtPWCqXGOqVN2hu+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a linuxbox running shorewall, and on the lan side nic I have multiple
networks, and ip's from both assigned to the nic. One network is private,
and the other is public ip's. I have a web server running on the firewall
with multiple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Every time I post to this list, I recieve non-deliverable responces such as
the follow:
nonexist mail account : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:46:12 +0800
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Rip problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 29 September 2002 02:50 pm, Ramin Alidousti wrote:
> > I have added a static route to the portmaster until I can figure this
> > out.
>
> Yes. For your setup static route is good enough and possibly the easiest.
> But just as an exercise, I'
On Sunday, 29 September 2002, at 11:24:03 -0700,
Simon Matthews wrote:
> I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by
> different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet
> connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet
> conn
On Monday 23 September 2002 05:29, Adi Nugroho wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 July 2002 02:49, Stef Coene wrote:
> > Actually, the remaining bandwidth is not divided proportional to the
> > rate, but to quantum.
>
> Helo
> I would like to ask about r2q and quantum.
> I'm using sfq, which has also so
On Sunday 29 September 2002 20:05, gypsy wrote:
> First, it is impossible for there to be LENDED without BORROWED. (And
> proper English would be LOANED not LENDED.)
>
> Second, where is a (console, not X; we do not run X on our servers!!)
> utility to determine what is happening so that one can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I want to to that
local network ---eth0--- tunnel entry point tunnel exit point.
(windows and linux pcs)
I'm using vtun and I'm masquerating on both tunnel machines, my problem is now
that a ping works also small packets but if the pac
> I will try to be as complete as possible :)
>
> I have a /24, ie xx.xx.xx.0 - xx.xx.xx.255
> This is split into 4 subnets ie /26
> The xx.xx.xx.0/26 subnet is used on the network that the portmaster
> is plugged into. I also have a second Portmaster on this network, and
> xx.xx.xx.63/26 is asig
I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by
different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet
connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet
connections do NOT have equal bandwidth
How do I configure the SNAT/MASQ and ensure
First, it is impossible for there to be LENDED without BORROWED. (And
proper English would be LOANED not LENDED.)
Second, where is a (console, not X; we do not run X on our servers!!)
utility to determine what is happening so that one can set
WonderShaper's UPLINK and DOWNLINK and see immediatel
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 02:49, Stef Coene wrote:
> Actually, the remaining bandwidth is not divided proportional to the rate,
> but to quantum.
Helo
I would like to ask about r2q and quantum.
I'm using sfq, which has also something named quantum.
the question is
I I want that the remai
On Sunday 29 September 2002 07:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi..
> I've tried both (HTB & CBQ) the queuing descpliens and I think HTB is
> more efficient than CBQ. But i think HTB is still in beta. I just want
> to know if I can go for HTB right away. I mean, is it stable? I'm
> trying to implem
Alrighty... I seem to have gotten to the bottom of the oops dilemnas...
I was attaching the qdiscs to ppp0 - I've now (for the last 15-odd
minutes) got them attached to eth3 (the interface the DSL device is
attached to) and all seems well (although there's not enough traffic
right now to see how i
Small update - I just transposed the Wondershaper from the howto (that I
thought was okay before) into a script - it lasted about 1min :-/
Unfortunately, I forgot to take down the oops message before rebooting
the box...
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 13:27, Mattt wrote:
> Greetings List'ers :-)
>
> H
18 matches
Mail list logo
