Thanks Werner, :)
i turned the SMP off , and everything is ok now. :)
i do have a single CPU machine and i was so careless
that i did not notice that option. :)
anyway , i turned it off now and everything looks
good. :)
thanks again.
folke.
From: Werner Almesberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
I want to do something like this:
ip addr add 1.1.1.1/24 brd + dev eth3 scope link table my_table
so that
1. Direct route 1.1.1.1/24 should go to table my_table.
2. Address 1.1.1.1 should be recognizes as a local only for packets received on dev
eth3.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
- Jacob
__
Kerschbaumer Samuel wrote:
I downloaded the HTB and ESFQ packages and installled the patched
kernel and tools.
Now can someone give me an example how to configure my system so that
the 512Kbit are fairly divided for each computer ? Assume that eth0 is
the interface on the WAN side and eth1 on
Oskar Andreasson wrote:
However, I notice one _big_ if in the page you are referring to, which by
the way is quite old (dated circa 1996).
I have a distinct feeling that many IP based protocols don't change a
lot within these types of timespans. Look at how long IPv6 is taking to
deploy.
"
I've finally decied that the prio qdisc needs to be attached to root.
Delay should be minimized first, with normal service 2nd, and max
throughput third in the 3 band setup I have planned. Are there any
recommendations? Basically terminals with telnet or ssh should get first
priority with web tra
I downloaded the HTB and ESFQ packages and installled the patched kernel
and tools.
Now can someone give me an example how to configure my system so that
the 512Kbit are fairly divided for each computer ? Assume that eth0 is
the interface on the WAN side and eth1 on the LAN side.
Thanks
_
Hi Michael,
In short, I took Alexey on his words on this matter since I didn't know
about the statements below...
However, I notice one _big_ if in the page you are referring to, which by
the way is quite old (dated circa 1996). Take a look at this page which is
linked from the document you sh
Hi,
I want to use ip rule to policy route some traffic using the Full TOS field.
I patched iptables to mangle the ip-header DSCP field. But I can only use
some values of the TOS field with ip rule.
How can I patch ip rule so I can do policy routing based on the DSCP field?
regards Rinse
___
Things have been going well with my progress on integrating traffic
control in conjunction with DHCP and a web interface for my project. I
have run into another crutch though. The box needs to limit traffic based
off of ip but I was just informed that the traffic also has to be limited
as a whole
On Thursday 24 October 2002 20:46, Hayden Myers wrote:
> Things have been going well with my progress on integrating traffic
> control in conjunction with DHCP and a web interface for my project. I
> have run into another crutch though. The box needs to limit traffic based
> off of ip but I was j
On Thursday 24 October 2002 14:29, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> Ok:
>
> My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
> My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
> My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
> My public network is:213.250.143.240/28
My little route only manage the range 172.16.16.0/24 and my public route
only manages the range 213.250.143.240/28. I cannot add new rules because
these routers are administer by other company and this company cannot
colaborate me.
Please can you help me, please?
Ángel
-Mensaje original
Folke Aeon wrote:
> i do the following on my linux,
Which kernel ... ? SMP or not ? CONFIG_PREEMPT set ?
At least 2.5.44, neither SMP not preempt, didn't do anything
funny when I tried this.
- Werner
--
_
/ Werner Almes
hi, all
i met another question.
i do the following on my linux,
tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 64
tc class change dev eth1 classid 1:11 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0x28
tc class change dev eth1 classid 1:21 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0x48
tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol all
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, raptor wrote:
> anyone to know a tool that will display more friendly output ...
> probably a tree like structure (if no cross sections occur)...
Some time ago I've started working on something like this, only
different. ;-)
Actually it is a perl module which interfaces with
hi,
anyone to know a tool that will display more friendly output ... probably a tree like
structure (if no cross sections occur)...
OR a top like output...
thanx
raptor
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo
Hi !
I have a little problem for who knows.
I have an interface where i've limited some ip addresses using HTB algorithm and the
tools form iproute2.What i whant is to limit only packets marked by DSCP.
--
Barbulescu Mihai
Network Engineer
RoEduNet Bucharest NOC
___
Ok:
My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.
The public router is 213.250.143.2
On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:23, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a debian server with 4 network cards:
> The first card is used to connect to public network and this network
> connects with a big router.
> The Second, third and fourth cards are used by other networks.
> The first card
On Thursday 24 October 2002 08:22, Tom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use a Debian Woody with Kernel 2.4.18 patched with the HTB queue. I use
> the tc binay given within the HTB targz. Iptables 1.2.6a
> I wrote this script based on the ADSL Bandwith management howto :
>
> DEV=eth0
> RATEUP=128
>
> tc qdisc
Rehi all,
I continue to search and now it's work. There is what i did :
- I change my interface from eth0 to ppp0
- I change the chain from POSTROUTING to OUTPUT (evene if the both possibly
work)
- I add the quantum to the SFQ queue, it was 1492 now it's 1500 (the same
as my MTU)
- I reduce the
On Thursday 24 October 2002 10:43, Walter Haidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Tom wrote:
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 20 fw flowid
> > 1:20 tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 21 fw
> > flowid 1:21 tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio
On Thursday 24 October 2002 01:31, Kristiadi Himawan wrote:
> Any body knows how to make hosts bandwidth in a class
> got same bandwidth with the other, so no one can dominate
> the class bandwidth.
Efsq, like sfq, but you can configure it so it only uses ip-addresses as the
hash key. I have a li
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Tom wrote:
> tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 20 fw flowid 1:20
> tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 21 fw flowid 1:21
> tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 22 fw flowid 1:22
This odd. With my setup (
Thank Werner,
that's helps alot :)
i managed to figure out that the following does the trick for me :
tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 64
tc class change dev eth1 classid 1:11 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0x28
tc class change dev eth1 classid 1:21 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0x48
tc filter
Hi all,
I have a debian server with 4 network cards:
The first card is used to connect to public network and this network
connects with a big router.
The Second, third and fourth cards are used by other networks.
The first card used a dinamic route with the big router.
The other cards used a stati
26 matches
Mail list logo
