[LARTC] pb with imq

2002-11-11 Thread manish bhatt
hi stef oone more pb while shaping incoming traffic with imq .this one tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1mbit tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid

[LARTC] does metric in route works?

2002-11-11 Thread Poltorak Serguei
Hello I would like to know how does metric work for now. I'm trying to use it for "failover". if my nexthop (gateway) is down i want another route with bigger metric to be used. for now all in vain. :( are there any implementation of metric in current routing mechanism?? PoltoS/ __

[LARTC] use or non-use of multiple processors in forwarding

2002-11-11 Thread Don Cohen
More info on this problem: > /proc/stat shows me that all of the [packet forwarding] work is done by one cpu, the other does nothing. /var/log/messages shows the following interesting data: kernel: enabled ExtINT on CPU#0 kernel: masked ExtINT on CPU#1 Does anyone know that this means, whe

Re: [LARTC] Squid + Htb + Nat, problem.

2002-11-11 Thread Randolph Carter
Yes Squid an TC are on the same machine. I know fwmarks exists only in kernel's memory. ToS and DSCP goes in the TOS field in the IP packet. I need the packet inside my machine, I don't care about it when it leaves it. > > > Are you running both Squid and tc on the same machine? Its worth > menti

Re: [LARTC] Squid + Htb + Nat, problem.

2002-11-11 Thread Randolph Carter
That's true rob, should be in the OUTPUT traffic. But rob, the problem is I'm trying to limit the upstream which in the case in which is squid is used, seems always to come from the local machine to the internet, so TC will not know to whom belongs that packet, it just belong to the local machi

Re: [LARTC] Squid + Htb + Nat, problem.

2002-11-11 Thread Randolph Carter
I apologize if I offended you, my intention was not to offend anyone, sorry(I was just kidding, I already know of the great advantages on Layer 3 squid offers, but is not the solution that I'm looking for). What u say is what I'm actually doing, using acl in order to put a DSCP mark on each pac

[LARTC] ipsec + IKE automatic keying works somewhat+docs

2002-11-11 Thread bert hubert
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.ipsec.automatic.keying.html ^ you can now almost to automatic keying. you can do most of it in fact! -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO __

[LARTC] tc and lane

2002-11-11 Thread mirceas
Hello! Could someone tell me if there are some limitations using tc on an ATM card, especially using LANE? Regards, Mircea. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/