: I have a debian (woody) box acting as router for my network and I am trying
: to setup a dmz (210.xxx.xxx.225/29).
This is a classic case of a breaking a network in two with proxy ARP. You
can do this exactly as you indicate (assuming the xxx.xxx numbers are all
accurate).
: anyway, w
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 10:52, sabat wrote:
> I've seen a lot of info about running redundant routes to different ISPs
> in the HOWTO and on this list. That surprises me, because I would expect
> that a more common situation would be redundant routes to the *same* ISP
> -- the typical HSRP + load
guys, i need some help with some problems I'm having
I have a debian (woody) box acting as router for my network and I am trying
to setup a dmz (210.xxx.xxx.225/29).
anyway, whenever a request comes in for one of the boxes in the dmz the
gateway box doesn't seem to answer any arp requests for it
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 18:39, Homer Parker wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:29:00 +0100 Stef Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
>
> > > different things, all failing, some worse than others. The end result
> > > is to throttle back 126 IP's individually. I've read so much over the
> > > last
On Monday 02 December 2002 15:33, James Ma wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> Does anyone have working scripts using HTB for QoS but IPtables for
> filtering? I want to learn how to put them together. Do the scripts working
> on Redhat?
I have some working scripts on www.docum.org
And I think RedHat has the nee
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 12:35, Thomas Jalsovsky wrote:
> Hello,
> I compiled 2.4.20-ac1 on RedHat Linux 8.0. I know about problems
> with tc (from ML archive) and I tryed the binary from
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz
> It works fine, but I would like to compile
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 14:20, Koot, M. wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following setup.
>
> 192.168.1.2
> +--+ / +-+
>
> | ADSL | /| | ++
>
> INTERNET-|Router|-eth0eth1-|Linux|-eth0- ---| SWITCH |
>
>
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 16:40, Andreas Wright wrote:
> Yes you are right the linux kernel version 2.4.5
> I didnt understand your comment " I'm not sure if the QOS stuff is compiled
> into the standard suse kernel, if not you need to compile it by yourself "
> What I am trying to do following
>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:34:00PM +0100, virdzek, roman wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i have one little problem,and i can't find answer.
>
> PC1
>
>eth1 eth2
> 10.0.0.1/810.0.0.2/8
>
I've seen a lot of info about running redundant routes to different ISPs
in the HOWTO and on this list. That surprises me, because I would expect
that a more common situation would be redundant routes to the *same* ISP
-- the typical HSRP + load balancing that so many of them run. Here's
what I
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:29:00 +0100 Stef Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
> > different things, all failing, some worse than others. The end result
> > is to throttle back 126 IP's individually. I've read so much over the
> > last few days, I've almost confused myself, and probably have ;)
> > T
hi all,
i have one little problem,and i can't find answer.
PC1
eth1 eth2
10.0.0.1/8 10.0.0.2/8
| 10.0.0.3/8 secondary
| |
| |
| |
|
switch -
|
|
|
eth1
10.0.0.10/8
PC2
(def
Yes you are right the linux kernel version 2.4.5
I didnt understand your comment " I'm not sure if the QOS stuff is compiled into the standard suse kernel, if not you need to compile it by yourself "
What I am trying to do following
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
match
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 15:27, Andreas Wright wrote:
> I am using Suse Linux version 2.4.5.
there is no such suse version
the current version is 8.1
I guess that you've have 7.x, as I belive 2.4.5 is the version of your kernel
anyway tc and ip
Hello ,
I am using Suse Linux version 2.4.5.
Where can I get tc utility for this version and what version of iproute2 should I be using ?
I want to use tc filters for prioritzing packets from a specific IP address.
Regards ,
Andreas.With Yahoo! Mail you can get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size tha
Hi all,
I have the following setup.
192.168.1.2
+--+ / +-+
| ADSL | /| | ++
INTERNET-|Router|-eth0eth1-|Linux|-eth0- ---| SWITCH |
| |/ | | \+-+-+-+-++
i want to use the iptables -j QUEUE feature, and where i must start to
read the docs???
is other way, more faster or reliable, or easyer to do packet analysis
(flow based), loging.
i don't do programing all the time so something "easy" i'll apreciate.
End i don't need too much real-time.
thank's
Hello,
I compiled 2.4.20-ac1 on RedHat Linux 8.0. I know about problems
with tc (from ML archive) and I tryed the binary from
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz
It works fine, but I would like to compile the whole iproute2 to allow HTB
and I don't want to use a downloa
On Monday 02 December 2002 10:55, Andrei Boros wrote:
> Suppose:
>
> ipchains -A forward -s inside_net -d 0/0 -j MASQ -m 100
>
> (similar setup with iptables:
> iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -s inside_net -d 0/0 -j SNAT
> iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -s inside_net -d 0/0 -j MARK --set_mark
> 100)
Hello,
Apache sets the NODELAY flag on all packets it sends. Does anyone know of a
way to selectively change this in the apache config.
I would like to be able to specify certain dirs to set other flags, to be able
to match these packets with tc (and shape accordingly), without having to use
addi
On Monday 02 December 2002 13:08, Jakub Surý wrote:
> Hi please sorry of my english,
>
> What is my problem. I am very small ISP. I have link 512kBit. I have 10
> clients. I want use htb.init and i dont understand this script. I have this
> : My first 3 client group download and upload 128 kBit. My
On Monday 02 December 2002 15:33, James Ma wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> Does anyone have working scripts using HTB for QoS but IPtables for
> filtering? I want to learn how to put them together. Do the scripts working
> on Redhat?
The default redhat kernel should be fine.
And for scripts, see www.docum.or
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 06:49, Homer Parker wrote:
> I'm trying to implement something similar the the diagram in section
> 9.5.2.1 in the LARTC HOWTO, but must have missed something somewhere :(
> I'm trying to hack up wondershaper, as it looked like a good place to
> start.. Here's wher
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 08:50, Rajiv Ghai wrote:
> HI
> I have read the advanced routing and traffic control and have a question on
> policing. I am using RH 7.1 and have two interfaces, one eth0 to the
> internet 256K and one eth1 to some 50 students on a LAN connected via a 2
> MBPS wireless
24 matches
Mail list logo
