[LARTC] Neighbour table overflow

2002-12-06 Thread Arindam Haldar
hi all, i am getting a lot of neighbour table overflow in my syslog file... we use slavkware8.1 with kernel2.4.19 squid2.5s1 iptables1.2.7a & iproite-ss020116.. there are two providers & this box has 5 ethernet and i havent seen it handle going less that 2.5mb traffic even at off peak hours !..

[LARTC] Neighbour table overflow

2002-12-06 Thread Arindam Haldar
hi all, i am getting a lot of neighbour table overflow in my syslog file... we use slavkware8.1 with kernel2.4.19 squid2.5s1 iptables1.2.7a & iproite-ss020116.. there are two providers & this box has 5 ethernet and i havent seen it handle going less that 2.5mb traffic even at off peak hours !..

Re: [LARTC] redhat ready for htb?

2002-12-06 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 06 December 2002 19:58, James Ma wrote: > Hi, All, > > I want to use linux (redhat) to do some bandwidth shaping work. I did know > something on HTB and IPtables but I have very limited knowledge on Linux > itself. I was told it's hard for non linux expert to patch the kernel or > even pt

[LARTC] redhat ready for htb?

2002-12-06 Thread James Ma
Hi, All,   I want to use linux (redhat) to do some bandwidth shaping work. I did know something on HTB and IPtables but I have very limited knowledge on Linux itself. I was told it's hard for non linux expert to patch the kernel or even ptach HTB into IPROUTE2. So I would like to know if the

[LARTC] u32 filter

2002-12-06 Thread Kaustubh Phanse
Hello! What is the significance of "handle" in a u32 filter?? For example, if I have a HTB class 1:1 and three child classes 1:11, 1:12, and 1:13. Within 1:11, I define dsmark, say 2:0, and let it mark packets with certain DSCP. Now, using the u32 filter I need to classify packets of a certain fl

[LARTC] ECN and ipitables: a political issue

2002-12-06 Thread Andrea Rossato
Hi there! I recently discovered that the linux kernel support Explicit Congestion Notification and that a fully ecn enabled network would have virtually no dropped packets. Enabling that feature is a way to respect the infrastructure we use, and servers, routers or firewalls not complying with

Re: [LARTC] Filter question...

2002-12-06 Thread Andrea Rossato
Victor Dario Martinez wrote: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 4.3.2.1/32 flowid 10:1 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument shouldn't it be tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 4.3.2.1/32 flowid 10:1

Re: [LARTC] kernel and routing

2002-12-06 Thread Stephane Ouellette
Giannhs Panagiotou wrote: First of all sorry for my English. Many of us are not native english speakers. I wan't to ask a question. It may be 'dummy' but i can't find an answer. Suppose i'm routing with a Linux pc A where is the default 'instalation' kernel. I'm also routing with a Lin

[LARTC] Filter question...

2002-12-06 Thread Victor Dario Martinez
I have a Linux Mandrake SNF (Single Network Firewall) with 2.2.17-21mdk recompiled with full advanced routing options enabled. I implements de traffci control to prioriced aplication traficc (informix ports, internal aplications ports, incoming DNS queries, etc) over common trafic (HTML ,FTP, e

Re: [LARTC] HTB on IMQ

2002-12-06 Thread Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
On Friday, 06 December 2002, at 09:50:29 +0100, Vladimir Smelhaus wrote: > > Is the shaper configuration (one IMQ for ingress and eggress traffic > > from the same physical interface) WRONG or simple it is a kernel bug? > > It is wrong. You must have separate imq devices for ingress and > egres

Re: [LARTC] what NIC for heavy load?

2002-12-06 Thread Alexander Trotsai
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:30:10PM +0100, Anton Tinchev wrote: AT>Hi, AT>first i wonna thank you for the great work. AT>I have few slack boxes with several 3com cards that acts as routers. AT>Some of them has 50+ vlans, 100 000+ routing entries, full BGP (zebra) with 10+ peers AT>and routes 50-70

Re: [LARTC] HTB on IMQ

2002-12-06 Thread Vladimir Smelhaus
On 6 Dec 2002, 9:34, Thomas Jalsovsky wrote: > Is the shaper configuration (one IMQ for ingress and eggress traffic > from the same physical interface) WRONG or simple it is a kernel bug? It is wrong. You must have separate imq devices for ingress and egress. i.e. modprobe imq numdevs=2 ipta

Re: [LARTC] HTB on IMQ

2002-12-06 Thread Thomas Jalsovsky
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote: > On Thursday, 05 December 2002, at 10:04:23 +0100, > Thomas Jalsovsky wrote: > > > could somebody check my IMQ+HTB config? Is it OK? > > Why am I asking for this? > > I got kernel panic and I don't know what is wrong in my config/system. > >