Re: Netfilter target: CLASSIFY (was Re: [LARTC] QoS in Linux: Project Suggestion)

Hi Patrick! > >>ok this one actually compiles ;) > >> > >> > > > >just a small bug in your code: > > > > > > > >>+ *p = TC_H_MAKE(i, j); > >> > >> > > > >that should be changed to TC_H_MAKE(i<<16, j) > > > > > > > thanks, i've attached a changed diff. have you actually tested it ? > does

[LARTC] controlling the tc system

hi, i've been trying to find some information on this but haven't had any luck. what i'm interested in is any way to control the tc system progmatically without having to shell out to the tc program. i've already found some stuff for controlling iptables progmatically, but have been out of luck so

Re: Netfilter target: CLASSIFY (was Re: [LARTC] QoS in Linux: ProjectSuggestion)

Abraham van der Merwe wrote: Hi Patrick! ok this one actually compiles ;) just a small bug in your code: + *p = TC_H_MAKE(i, j); that should be changed to TC_H_MAKE(i<<16, j) thanks, i've attached a changed diff. have you actually tested it ? does it work ? ;) bye, patric

Re: Netfilter target: CLASSIFY (was Re: [LARTC] QoS in Linux: Project Suggestion)

Hi Patrick! > ok this one actually compiles ;) just a small bug in your code: > + *p = TC_H_MAKE(i, j); that should be changed to TC_H_MAKE(i<<16, j) -- Regards Abraham Here we are in America ... when do we collect unemployment? ___ Abr

[LARTC] Filter/Classifier

How are filters parsed? Say I have a filter for a specific IP address: tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 0 u32 match ip dst 10.0.0.2 flowid 1:40 but then I have a filter for a port tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip sport 80 0x flowid 1:10

[LARTC] building a multicast router

Title: building a multicast router Hi, I have been reading: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.multicast.html in effort to understand how to route multicast traffic and just joined the group. History: I am trying to multicast mpeg (using the videolan server) on a private network.   The server sid

Re: [LARTC] marking

On Tuesday 28 January 2003 22:47, Jay Wineinger wrote: > Ok, that KPTD helps a bit. Question about that though, it seems that a > forwarded packet will have 3 chances at getting marked (PRE,FORWARD,POST); > is that correct? Similarly, a packet originating on the QoS box will have > 2 mark chances

[LARTC] Mark packets based on nexthop?

hello, is there a patch or a way to mark packets with IPtables marking based on the nexthop for the packet? Thnks -- Anton Yurchenko<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Digital Generation ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/list

[LARTC] failover with Multilink

Hi, I have a gateway that is connecet throught the internet with a permanet DSL link and dial on demand ISDN line. If the DSL link is up I want that only this link is used. If it fail the ISDN line. If read http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html and I need basicly the load balancing

[LARTC] Multipath routing with different bandwidth and cost

Hi, My workstation is connected to a LAN with two different gateways. GW1 is rate-limited to 2Mbps while GW2 is unlimited. Routing through GW1 is cheaper, thus I don't want to be using only GW2. At any given time, I would like to be able to use GW1 while keeping it uncongestioned and to use GW2 f