- Forwarded message from Shaheen Hossain [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Shaheen Hossain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thanks for willing to help
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 01:53:02 +0600
Thanks Bartek, this was of great help. As a result, my mail is now
functional. Great, thanks.
-
So if you use 5s interval in rrd it seems ok for me (it
is what i plan to do here).
If you receive an update each second, you have the feeling it's realtime.
It's slow enough to understand the data and it's fast enough to feel it as
real-time. It's also fast enought that you get new data
Hi folks,
Can I use in the same parent but for the diffrent classes u32 filter rules:
1) filtering by ip address (very low speed only for the Internet)
2) filtering by port (smb, smtp and pop3) for the local connection
Thanks in advance
Remus
___
Quantum is used only for leaves.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
Query:
In HTB, is the quantum parameter used for non leaf classes, or it is
meaningful only for leaf classes?
Doing
tc -s -d class show
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 17:24, Remus wrote:
Hi folks,
Can I use in the same parent but for the diffrent classes u32 filter rules:
1) filtering by ip address (very low speed only for the Internet)
2) filtering by port (smb, smtp and pop3) for the local connection
Yes.
Stef
--
[EMAIL
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:29, devik wrote:
So if you use 5s interval in rrd it seems ok for me (it
is what i plan to do here).
If you receive an update each second, you have the feeling it's realtime.
It's slow enough to understand the data and it's fast enough to feel it
as
I have a requirement to be connected to a T1/E1
leased line WAN. Because of QoS issues, I am
considering these options :-
1. Purchase a router which has some form of
bandwidth management - this would be
expensive, rite ?
2. Purchase a low end router with 1 lan 1 wan,
and connects a
Well I got more smartbits to my development bench and
tried out various precidence values from two ethernet
ports going out a t1 port. The receiving smartbits on
the other end show that the low priority flows were
starved while I did 100 t1 load at the high priority.
So this does work as
Hello all,
: 1. Purchase a router which has some form of bandwidth management - this
:would be expensive, rite ?
You have to decide what is expensive for you. Time, money, expertise,
control, or not having a software/networking vendor to vilify.
: 2. Purchase a low end router with 1 lan
Well
I understand why quantum should be at least equal to
mtu size
but let´s think in this
if i have a dsl link and i want to give more quality
to
one voip user
i´ve already solved the dsl upload problem transfering
the bottleneck to my shapping box.
Should i change the quantum to a lower
[sorry for the delay; I had postponed the mail and forgotten to send]
Szymon,
You'll want to read this thread from a month ago (or so):
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q1/006781.html
To summarize, packets bound for the a destination in the routing cache
will be routed out
Hello there again,
: I recommend the Sangoma WAN cards. I've been using them for at least 3
: years under linux, and they are well supported by Sangoma and the linux
: community (you'll see the driver in the distribution).
:
: Regarding Sangoma solution, what Linux kernel version they
I set up a Perl script to parse the output of 'tc -s qdisc show dev if' to get
stats for MRTG. The only problem is, every time the tc command runs, I get many
lines output to my kernel level syslog - 84, to be exact They look something
like this:
oatmail kernel: htb*c10124 m=2 t=22748 c=19272
13 matches
Mail list logo
