[LARTC] Bridge+QOS

2003-03-16 Thread hare ram
Hi all iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works i ahve setup like this LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet in LAN i have users 10 people i would like to have QOS Services for 5 people burstable 5 People commited ( bounded b/w w

[LARTC] IMQ ingress shaping

2003-03-16 Thread Jirka Pirko
is here anybody successfully running HTB + IMQ for ingress traffic?? i can't do it :( i'm using following commands: # ifconfig imq0 up # iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 -j IMQ --todev imq0 # tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1 htb default 0 # tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:2 h

Re: [LARTC] [LONG] Weird problem with HTB using htb.init

2003-03-16 Thread Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
On Sunday 16 March 2003 22:13, Stef Coene wrote: > > You have a sfq qdisc attached to your parent class. That's not possible. > You can add the sfq qdisc, but if you add a child class, the sfq qdisc is > removed. Hmm, i removed it. Still timeouts, but it wouldnt matter as it would be removed an

Re: [LARTC] [LONG] Weird problem with HTB using htb.init

2003-03-16 Thread Stef Coene
On Sunday 16 March 2003 21:52, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote: > This is a long message. Please use a monospace font :) > > I'm trying to shape the traffic between my LAN and the Internet. My link is > an ADSL 512/128 line. The network is shaped like this: > >LAN

[LARTC] [tcng] ip-range

2003-03-16 Thread Jacob Teplitsky
> Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 01:28:01 +0200 > From: raptor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [LARTC] [tcng] ip-range > > Is there a way in tcng to specify range instead a list of addresses, what I mean > instead : > > drop if (ip_src == 192.168.0.2 || ip_src == 192

Subject: [LARTC] [tcng] X:Y to tcng corespondence !

2003-03-16 Thread Jacob Teplitsky
> Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:49:49 +0200 > From: raptor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [LARTC] [tcng] X:Y to tcng corespondence ! > > Is there a easy way that I to get class-id<->tcng-class-path conversation > and vs. versa.. > > --__--__-- There are

[LARTC] how to do source routing in same table?

2003-03-16 Thread Abraham van der Merwe
Hi! I have the following setup: ISP 1 ISP 2 +-- +-- \ / \ / +--+ | router A | +--+ /\ \

[LARTC] [LONG] Weird problem with HTB using htb.init

2003-03-16 Thread Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This is a long message. Please use a monospace font :) I'm trying to shape the traffic between my LAN and the Internet. My link is an ADSL 512/128 line. The network is shaped like this: LAN GATEWAY ROUTER -- -

Re: Re[8]: [LARTC] CBQ Traffic control not working

2003-03-16 Thread Stef Coene
On Sunday 16 March 2003 09:26, Mugur TOMITA wrote: > Indeed, I use transparent proxy, redirecting everything on port 80 to > 3128, on the same machine. To make sure it's clear, the scenario is > simple: client enters eth1 on port 80, gets redirected to port 3128... > I mark the packet depending on

Re: [LARTC] HTB & port shaping

2003-03-16 Thread raptor
oops sorry for not writing in english :"( ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB & port shaping

2003-03-16 Thread raptor
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:51:56 +0200 Georgi Angelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |Hi all i have properly working HTB. Now i must allow users connects to |CounterStrike server that is behind my HTB shaper server. |How can do this? ]- nai weroqtno, nasochi counter strike trafika si kam FIFO da rechem i

Re: Re: [LARTC] Problems with route by fwmark

2003-03-16 Thread Sebastian Schneider
Great, it works now: Mar 16 11:59:15 persephone kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 SRC=192.168.1.146 DST=192.168.1.146 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=62 ID=0 DF PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 ID=51311 SEQ=256 Basti "Alexander W. Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 15.03.03 14:17:32: > > On Sat, Ma

Re[8]: [LARTC] CBQ Traffic control not working

2003-03-16 Thread Mugur TOMITA
Indeed, I use transparent proxy, redirecting everything on port 80 to 3128, on the same machine. To make sure it's clear, the scenario is simple: client enters eth1 on port 80, gets redirected to port 3128... I mark the packet depending on its source and than I apply a tc filter to direct it to the