Re: [LARTC] Multiple internet providers

2003-03-21 Thread Martin A. Brown
Kim, Well, I *think* the solution is a simple sysctl twiddle (see close to the bottom), but I left my reasoning and research intact on the off-chance that my method would benefit you or posterity reviewing this thread.. iptables mangle thoughts - - - - - - - - - - - - - I have line broken the ipt

[LARTC] Bad diff

2003-03-21 Thread Damian Halloran
Am having a problem with HTB. The following message is generated twice every 4 minutes in syslog. Mar 20 18:17:52 sale kernel: HTB: bad diff in events, cl=10011 diff=F1AB2000 now=4054360064 then=4294803456 j=115313989 The HTB rules are generated by: /sbin/tc qdisc del dev wp1_fr16 root /sbin/t

Re: [LARTC] (no subject)

2003-03-21 Thread Kjell Chris. Flor
Where and how exactly do I tell that a HTB class should use which phy. dev.? >>> You can do this with iptables + fw filter. Mark the packets coming from >>> each interface with a different mark and put the packets with the fw filter >>> in it's own class. >> >> But why do I need IMQ for

Re: [LARTC] (no subject)

2003-03-21 Thread Nickola Kolev
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:38:17 +0100 "Kjell Chris. Flor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ cut ] > > > Where and how exactly do I tell that a HTB > > > class should use which phy. dev.? > > You can do this with iptables + fw filter. Mark the packets coming from > each > > interface with a different mark

Re: [LARTC] (no subject)

2003-03-21 Thread Kjell Chris. Flor
> > Hi > > > > In the introduction of IMQ ( http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/ ) > > it sais: > > > > Quote start. > > "This allows you to treat network devices > > as classes and distribute bandwidth among > > them as well as doing real ingress traffic > > control using egress qdiscs" > > quote sto

Re: [LARTC] Multiple internet providers

2003-03-21 Thread Martin A. Brown
Hi there Kim, : Thanks for the help, I got started but have a strange problem. : According to the adv-multi-internet.html doc, I should set up a couple : of simple rules, first the IP routing, which seems to be running : smoothely, secondly, I have to set up the iptables rules as well, this :

Re: [LARTC] Multiple internet providers

2003-03-21 Thread Kim Jensen
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 17:47, Martin A. Brown wrote: > That's one approach, documented here: > > http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html > Hi Martin, Thanks for the help, I got started but have a strange problem. According to the adv-multi-internet.html doc, I should set up a couple

Re: [LARTC] IMQ ingress shaping

2003-03-21 Thread Alexander Trotsai
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Jirka Pirko wrote: JP>is here anybody successfully running HTB + IMQ for ingress traffic?? i can't JP>do it :( JP>i'm using following commands: JP># ifconfig imq0 up JP># iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 -j IMQ --todev imq0 I see mistake at line

RE: [LARTC] Policy routing/Zebra/VLAN pr oblem

2003-03-21 Thread Hocking James A
Hi Abraham, Thanks for the response. I should have mentioned that we are running OSPF. If I'm not mistaken (and please correct me if I am!) you are suggesting how we might configure the policy routing in R1. We got this far ourselves, but the difficulty arises when one of our links (to B or C -

RE: [LARTC] ip rule and transparent proxy.

2003-03-21 Thread Alessandro Ren
I found a way to do that. You have to mark tha packet on the OUTPUT, make a rule for that mark to go to where you want and you must set the tcp_outgoing_address in the squid.conf file to match the IP address of the interface you want the squid to start the connections from.

Re: [LARTC] Policy routing/Zebra/VLAN problem

2003-03-21 Thread Abraham van der Merwe
Hi Hocking! I had this problem a few days ago (; Create two routing tables for link B and link C. Add default gateways in these tables for each link (and routes to your network if you use static routing to route packets to R2/R3) then add rules to enqueue packets destined for your network into t

[LARTC] Policy routing/Zebra/VLAN problem

2003-03-21 Thread Hocking James A
Hi, I have an interesting (well, it is to me!) situation involving policy routing and VLANs. Apologies if the description is long-winded. The network is as follows: R2 B / / / ---> A --- R1 \ \

Re: [LARTC] Commited b/w question

2003-03-21 Thread Abraham van der Merwe
Hi hare! tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 2 r2q 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 256kbps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 64kbps ceil 64kbps tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 2: parent 1:2 sfq perturb 10 limit 178 tc class add dev eth0 parent

[LARTC] Commited b/w question

2003-03-21 Thread hare ram
Hi i been working tc and htb, its good and iam able to achieve some of the things what i required for me in my office i have question here like this i have total bandwidth 256kbps we have a department finace and admin i want to give a b/w of 64 both, either up or down to finance and admin 128k

[LARTC] Class crash (linux)

2003-03-21 Thread Lars Landmark
Hi; I am working width a project intended for developing an adaptive class based QoS system for Linux. I have been struggling width a bug for a long time now. The bug has been tracked to procedure tc_ctl_class() in file linux/net/sched/sch_api.c. In this function there are a switch test, in order