I know this is not the right place to ask this question, but i have an
stateful firewall and i am doing CONNTRACKING to mark the tcp connections,
and then with filters based on fw marks put them in the right qdisc.
The problem is that i have an uplink bandwith of 300kbit restricted to
250kbit
Hello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
From archive this seems to have come up a couple of times before although
I dont see a resolution on the list, any advice on how I can find out what
the problem is?
Thanks
I get the following errors
When I was going to send you my scripts I discovered where the mistake was. In
ethloop 'k' rates are kbps instead of kbits, so I was supplying very high rates...
I'm sorry for this. Anyway, thanks a lot for your help.
Albert
Stef Coene wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 17:43, Albert
I am trying to compare the behaviour of the Linux DiffServ implementation
with that of Cisco, in DSCP remarking for traffic policing.
As I understand it, the DSCP is marked at the egress interface (parent
queue), based on the class that packets are in.
I am looking at what happens at an inter-AS
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Something about IMQ device
I try to add imq0 with standard way in redhat distribution
via ifcfg-imq0 file (and add line in modules.conf) and got
BUG
If I attache IP address to IMQ device withing next hours
(may be days, randomly) kernel crash with stack dump and
panic
Without address same
Alexander Trotsai wrote:
Something about IMQ device
I try to add imq0 with standard way in redhat distribution
via ifcfg-imq0 file (and add line in modules.conf) and got
BUG
If I attache IP address to IMQ device withing next hours
(may be days, randomly) kernel crash with stack dump and
panic
I wrote this just as FYU for another users
I use IMQ at my work routers so I won't crash tham
And I far I know this crash I got only when traffic going
throw this interface
So I you said IP does not need for this interface and may
this this feature need to be described in documentation
Thanks
On
Hi people!
Maybe its messages is offtopic but... I have no good ideas how to solve my problem.
I am writing program that must realtime control traffic flows (
control/account/bandwitdth/etc ip traffic ).
I am using 2.4.x Netfilter queue kernel module (ip_queue) so program can get
Really Confusing me
---
make menuconfig
make install
reboot
make modules make modules_install
insmod sch_tbf
-
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/sched/sch_tbf.o: unresolved symbol qdisc_get_rtab
: Maybe its messages is offtopic but... I have no good ideas how to solve
: my problem.
It's not at all off topic for this list. You may find, if you need more
libipq help, that the netfilter-devel list is a better list, but for this
general and traffic control, too question, you have reached
I have a firewall (No NAT - just routing) configuration with a large
number of chains and rules.
I am now testing it on RH9 and it seems to take 100% user CPU time for
more than 30 minutes for the script to run (I am still waiting for it to
finish)
On RH7.1 a similar set of rules takes about
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:29, David Watson wrote:
Hello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
Why? That's not needed.
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Linux as bandwidth manager
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 00:23, Matias Surdi wrote:
I can't find the way to unsuscribe from this list. there isn't any
link to unsuscribe at the bottom of any mail
No ? Visit the url at the bottom of the mail and you can subscribe.
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Linux as
Andrew:
Differentiated Service on Linux HOWTO (work in progress) could be of some
help for you.
Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
Message: 6
From: Burnside, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:29, David Watson wrote:
ello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
Why? That's not needed.
Never mind that. The most important issue here is that when you delete
your queues, any packet that happens to
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 20:53, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:29, David Watson wrote:
ello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
Why? That's not needed.
Never mind that. The most important issue
You couldn't even if you wanted. High res timer requeres at least one of the
faster pentiums (not all pentiums can do it).
If you can't get a stable latency in the end, it might be worthwhile to
upgrade to a pentium, but for now I'd keep trying some finetuning.
Jannes Faber
- Original
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 20:53, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Never mind that. The most important issue here is that when you delete
your queues, any packet that happens to pass through them at that time,
are LOST!
Are you sure? I never tested it.
This is how I know it:
I constantly
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 21:17, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 20:53, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Never mind that. The most important issue here is that when you delete
your queues, any packet that happens to pass through them at that time,
are LOST!
Are
20 matches
Mail list logo
