Message: 13
>Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:17:33 -0300
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Ana Carolina Alonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [LARTC] RTNETLINK answers: invalid argument
>
>Hello, I had configure my router linux which has Suse 7.2, kernel 2.4.21.
>I had installed the QoS support into the k
Hi,
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:17:33 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ana Carolina Alonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [LARTC] RTNETLINK answers: invalid argument
Hello, I had configure my router linux which has Suse 7.2, kernel 2.4.21.
I had installed the QoS support into the kernel.
I am using load balancing, as far as i know, since both links have different
public ip's a connection has to go through the same router. A connections
means a http request to download a page, an ftp connection, telnet etc.., It
has to go though the asme router because it needs to have the same p
Hello
In the LARCT how-to subitem: 4.2.2. Load balancing the following phrase
says:
"" Instead of choosing one of the two providers as your default route, you
now set up the default route to be a multipath route. In the default kernel
this will balance routes over the two providers.
My setup looks like this
1inet---(yy.yy.186.12)router---network 172.16.0.0/16
(xx.xx.251.73)
|
|
2inet
Router is doing masquerade. There was one link to internet. I need
to connect to some host in 172.16.0.0
Hello,
I've put a debug line at the beginning of the u32 classifier to print the
content of the packets (skb->data) , but:
A, http client
B, web server, qos with u32 classifier
When doing http requests, the u32 classifier on host B isn't called for the
packet containing the GET/ request.
Then
J,
What i meant is...like in Linux you make use of the two external
connections and collate them as mentioned in the document. Can you try
keeping the Linux box in front of the two windowze boxen and collate the
two LAN connections coming from them as mentioned in the HOWTO???.
Trevor
On Sat,
Try removing the SFQ.
Trevor
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 13:54, Olivier DOURNAUX (DSI NOISIEL) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have set up QoS using HTB to identify classes and SFQ to
> order all classes traffic.
>
> It work fine but sometime "strange" paquets are sent... They
> contains correct data but header
David Watson wrote:
I did do a lot of ping tests and cannot replicate losing packets
however.
Hmmm, let me get back to you on this. I will test it again on Monday...
- Giannis
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/li
Lucas Aimaretto wrote:
It is like when you want to do trunking on switches, that means,
combine 2 or more ports on a switch to get more bw available.
You must be referring to "bonding" or "EtherChannel". I have tried it in
linux. What you are saying can't work, becouse:
bonding, creates a seperate
Hello Ana,
There could me multiple reasons for the same. Try shortlisting the same
from here for a start.
* Is your kernel patched with htb support
* Upgraded to 2.4.20> preferably 2.4.21 which has wonderful support for
HTB inbuilt.
* Does your version of tc support the same.
* If not google for
On Friday 20 June 2003 20:17, Ana Carolina Alonso wrote:
> Hello, I had configure my router linux which has Suse 7.2, kernel 2.4.21.
> I had installed the QoS support into the kernel. When I run the comand tc
> to create a CBQ qdisc, this work very well, but when I run tc to create the
> HTB qdisc
Hey pals...;)
RTFM. Check the LARTC HOWTO on the following points:
4. Rules - routing policy database
4.1. Simple source policy routing
4.2. Routing for multiple uplinks/providers
4.2.1. Split access
4.2.2. Load balancing
> I have 2 DSL lines on the same computer that gives me 2 different IP
>
> addresses on different subnets.
>
> 2M/256K: PPPoA
> 1M/256K: Classical IP over ATM
>
> How can I combine them (1M line and 2M line) together so that I
> would be able to use them at the same time to pull in at 3 mbits?
Hello, I had configure my router linux which has Suse 7.2, kernel 2.4.21.
I had installed the QoS support into the kernel. When I run the comand tc
to create a CBQ qdisc, this work very well, but when I run tc to create the
HTB qdisc I receive next message:
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
It would be wonderful if someone answer your question.
Put it on the list please.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Tesla 13
Enviado el: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:54 AM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [LARTC] HOW TO COMBINE 2 DSL LINES IN THE SAM
Hello,
I have 2 DSL lines on the same computer that gives me 2 different IP
addresses on different subnets.
2M/256K: PPPoA
1M/256K: Classical IP over ATM
How can I combine them (1M line and 2M line) together so that I would be
able to use them at the same time to pull in at 3 mbits?
I tried us
Hi
There are two processes about routing. (as deepak email said)
Forwarding is a process of moving packets from input
to output based on:
- Forwarding Table
- Information in the Packet.
Routing: The Process by which the Forwarding table is
built and maintianed.
- One or more routing protoco
I was recreating the qdiscs so that changes would be picked up
automatically and not disturb the rrdtool generation, I've switched to a
counter and cut out the resets.
I did do a lot of ping tests and cannot replicate losing packets
however.
Thanks
At 21:55 18/06/2003 +0200, y
I have the same problem using tc and iptables. All traffic goes to
"default".
I tried using tcng too: (eth0 as local NIC, eth1 as Inet nic, eth1
masquerading via iptables and bridged to DSL -I have the internet IP on NIC
2-)
#include "fields.tc"
#include "ports.tc"
dev eth1 {
egress {
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Groenewald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Giannis Stoilis'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Ivan Groenewald'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Παρασκευή, 20 Ιουνίου 2003 11:48 πμ
Subject: RE: [LARTC] tc ip group
> I have only used u32 in the past.
> O
I have only used u32 in the past.
On the LAN I still have to decide. Marking the packets with Iptables
sounds like a good idea and is quite simple.
How would I setup tc to match the marked packets (sorry I'm a bit lazy
to rtfm today :-))
Regards
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Giannis
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Groenewald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Παρασκευή, 20 Ιουνίου 2003 11:28 πμ
Subject: [LARTC] tc ip group
> Is it possible to classify traffic by ip groups ?
How do you classify your packets? u32?
Generally speaking, I have many prob
Is it possible to classify traffic by ip groups ?
The situation is,
Say a client is connected directly to our network but pays only for a
international rate. Say he is connected at 10Mpbs and is allowed 64Kbps
international. The agreement is that anything local (on our network) he
may access a
Hi,
I have set up QoS using HTB to identify classes and SFQ to
order all classes traffic.
It work fine but sometime "strange" paquets are sent... They
contains correct data but headers seams to be truncated: has if
the FIRST few bits were lost, or some alignment problem...
It doesn't occure if
cheers.
Having had another look at the kernel, and at the lartc howto it seems that
tc filter when policing may be able to reclassify out of profile traffic to
BE, but no more than this, without first putting traffic into a queue.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Balliache [mailt
I am setting up some traffic shaping on a 10Mbit (bursting to 20Mbit)
link. with various class rates from 2Mbit to 6Mbit
My router is Intel (1GHz processor)
I have configured my script using HTB, however from reading the
documentation HTB appears to be using the same alogorithm as TBF, and
TBF
27 matches
Mail list logo
