The CBFQ algorithm appears to be patented, looks like US Patent 6,047,000.
Does anyone know how this fits in with the GPL?
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Cheng Kwok Wing, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 9:44 AM
To: LARTC
Subject: [LARTC] A new classful qdisc
Folks,
I tried to implemented HTB in Slackware Linux 9.0
this is what happened:
Unknown qdisc htb, hence option default is unparsable
**HTB: failed to set root qdisc on eth0!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/sysconfig/htb# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
sch_htb
Hello all,
I have a simple question. Assuming a gateway has two interfaces (eth0 in
local network and eth1 in outside network), for traffic
controlling/shaping in two directions (inboundoutbound) using a this
(dedicated) gateway which is the best strategy:
1/ using default outbound shaping on
Unknown qdisc htb, hence option default is unparsable
**HTB: failed to set root qdisc on eth0!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/sysconfig/htb# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
sch_htb21120 0 (unused)
cls_route 5560 0 (unused)
cls_u32
Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
previous mail.
Trevor
--
( -GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE - )
/~\__[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ /~\
| \) / Pre Sales Consultant
Yes.. But what about fairness ??
Olivier.
-Message d'origine-
De : Trevor Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 20 juin 2003 10:06
À : Olivier DOURNAUX (DSI NOISIEL)
Cc : lartc
Objet : Re: [LARTC] Paquet pading problem using HTB+SFQ
Try removing the SFQ.
Trevor
On Fri,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
previous mail.
Trevor
We have 5 filters and still working.
I don't think there is a limit.
--
( -
Message: 11
Subject: RE: [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data
From: K S Sreeram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Jun 2003 09:18:18 +0530
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 22:05, S Mohan wrote:
Let us say eth0 is connected the Internet and eth1 to the local LAN. Then
shaping
* alexandru matei [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1/ using default outbound shaping on eth1 (outside interface) for
outgoing and outbound shaping on eth0 (inside interface) for incoming
2/ using default outbound shaping on eth1 (outside interface) for
outgoing and inbound shaping (with IMQ) on eth1
For information about ipchains/iptables see www.netfilter.org
The best up to date description of bridging I've seen is at
ebtables.sourceforge.net, lots of nice diagrams showing the interaction of
the bridge-nf code, ebtables and iptables - see doc ebtables/iptables
interaction on Linux based
Title: Mensaje
Prueba..
From: sam Njengah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:57:36 -0700
Subject: [LARTC] b/w management by ip
could anyone be having a sample configuration of bandwidth
management by =
ip ?
Here is an example:
http://www.geocities.com/jame_sj/
Your mileage my
Sebastian Strollo has provided a fix for the Dead-loop on netdevice
imq-issue,
new patches are available at http://trash.net/~kaber . The old page at
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq has been updated to redirect there. IMQ
now also
doesn't add the input/output device's link-layer header-sizes to
Shaping is done on the physical device irrespective of number of virtual
interface unless there is a specific virtual device support in kernel like
for IMQ. Best option would be to shape traffic on eth1 and eth0. Activate
policing for ingress queue on eth0 (external interface). Queue builds up for
14 matches
Mail list logo
