[LARTC] Problems with HTB and downloads more than 3mb

2003-07-05 Thread Thomas Switala
Hi I am busy configuring a bandwidth manager that acts as a bridge, the problem that I am currently experiencing is that it works perfectly for smaller classes like 32kbit, 42kbit etc. As soon as I create a class of 3072kbit or bigger it's constant download is at 6.2mbps. These are my commands th

Re: [LARTC] HTB doesn't respect rate values

2003-07-05 Thread Sergiusz Brzeziński
Thak you for your hints! > 1) 6kbit is really too small it should be at least 10 .. I tried with 12, 20 and even with 30kbit for 1:3 I noticed, that it work for some seconds (or 1-2 minutes) but than the 1:3 class gets more then it should get :(. > 2) it should workeven with 6k: > - look at s

Re: [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ

2003-07-05 Thread Martin Devera
Yes if you consider transmission over internet. Unfortunately it is mostly best effort medium and workable VoIP is possible mainly because of huge BW after user's access line .. And there is still no compatible Diffserv marking working over whole Internet. On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Gerry Creager N5JXS w

Re: [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ

2003-07-05 Thread Chijioke Kalu
Ok by me, am just desperate, after reading the documentation and tried differing configs, i was not successful, thus decided to ask experts, I will wait till monday thank you Sorry I answer some mails if it is under 30seconds or so. I have no time to write/test

Re: [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ

2003-07-05 Thread Martin Devera
Don't expect good quality if use local QoS for incomming data. To have real non-best effort you need to have QoS on both sides of link - when transmitting packets. Then yes - HTB should be able to do it using priorities. But I doubd you can do it if IMQ is in the way. devik On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chi

[LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ

2003-07-05 Thread Chijioke Kalu
Hello all, Please, does anyone have a setup where HTB or IMQ was used to set aside uplink/downlink speed for IP Telephony, in other to have clear voice quality? K _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. htt

Re: [LARTC] HTB doesn't respect rate values

2003-07-05 Thread Martin Devera
1) 6kbit is really too small it should be at least 10 .. 2) it should workeven with 6k: - look at stats (tc -s class show dev eth0) before and after the test - you are interested in drops. Also try it during the test to look whether queues are build up. devik On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Sergiusz B

Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-05 Thread devik
And what about attached one ? It seems to do the same but is less intrusive. htb_debug_dump is meant to do its output in all cases because it is called from bug-reporting places too. But yes the call in htb_dump is superfluous so I used your idea but changed it a bit. I'll submit it for inclusion l

Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-05 Thread Mike Mestnik
No, the patch dose not affect tc only dmesg/klogd ect. It changes printk's into HTB_DBG macros, these macros don't print unless you set HTB into debug mode :) The default kernel workes ?great? with my script 2.4.x and 2.5.x. Here is an example... The script workes like so... (10: is the qdisc-i

[LARTC] HTB doesn't respect rate values

2003-07-05 Thread Sergiusz Brzeziński
Hi, machine:AMD K6 200 MHz Linux distribution: Mandrake 8.1 kernel: compiled 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) ba