[LARTC] fwmark(ing) in OUTPUT; has anyone had success?

hi all, sorry for the re-post, but i am in a bad way ... trying to fwmark in OUTPUT --mangle has led to a null result for a routing table lookup. has anyone successfully accomplished this -- can you comment on your distro/iptables version ? in your debt, charles on redhat 8 with iptables 1.2.

Re: [LARTC] Why aren't filters working (as I wanted)?

Can you resend your mesaage in plain text and not in html format? Thx Stef On Thursday 10 July 2003 16:28, Vitor Carlos Flausino wrote: > > > > > > > > First of all, the configuration > > qdisc sfq 29: quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 10sec >  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts

[LARTC] Why aren't filters working (as I wanted)?

First of all, the configuration qdisc sfq 29: quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 10sec  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)  qdisc sfq 26: quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 10sec  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)  qdisc sfq 25: quantu

Re: [LARTC] How to let one node superior?

On Thursday 10 July 2003 10:57, Jack H. Qi wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a newbie question and it is very simple. In my local network of 10M > bandwidth. I'd like to allow my PC to have a 9M bandwidth. While all the > other PCs share the rest 1M bandwidth. Suppose my pc 192.168.3.2 gateway > 192.

[LARTC] How to let one node superior?

Hello all, This is a newbie question and it is very simple. In my local network of 10M bandwidth. I'd like to allow my PC to have a 9M bandwidth. While all the other PCs share the rest 1M bandwidth. Suppose my pc 192.168.3.2 gateway 192.168.3.1. Then, how could I set it in my gateway linux box?