Re: [LARTC] marking in OUTPUT --mangle; locally generated packetsand route lookup - broken?

Hi Patrick, Sincere thanks for your time help! i assume you mean CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK and not CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MARK. Yup -- sorry! i would start with putting some printks in ipt_local_hook (net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c) before the call to ip_route_me_harder and in

[LARTC] IMQ and 2.6 kernel

Hi, I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going to be ported to the 2.6 kernel. Please let me know. -- S. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] problem with htb rates | small rates question

Hi, I'm using 2.4.20 kernel with htb updated to match htb from 2.4.21 + patches on devik's page. My setup is simple: 192.168.0.134(LAN machine)--eth0-linuxRT-ppp0 (adsl, pppoe involved) 192.168.0.234(LAN machine)+ tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 22 r2q 1 tc class add dev eth0

Re: [LARTC] problem with htb rates | small rates question

- Original Message - From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LARTC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:17 PM Subject: [LARTC] problem with htb rates | small rates question Hi, I'm using 2.4.20 kernel with htb updated to match htb from 2.4.21 + patches on

[LARTC] Wondershaper only shaping one connection?

Hello, LARTC-List I still try to get my traffic-shaping done with Wondershaper 1.1a, but it does not work as expected. When I run the script, the verbose output looks good (using a SuSE-8.2-SMP-box with iproute2-2.4.7-473): + DOWNLINK=1800 + UPLINK=150 + DEV=ppp0 + NOPRIOHOSTSRC= +

[LARTC] Asking wandershap and htb

Dear All, I just wander, 1. Can i use wandersharp and also apply my current htb to minimalist latency ? How, any example ? 2. How the rule to said 192.168.0.1/24, but not the 192.168.0.10 ? (i use the htb init) 3. I've put djbdns behind the htb, but it look like sometime it make udp flood.

[LARTC] wonder shaper ratios problem

Hi, i test wonder shaper and these are the result: I have ADSL 512Kbits/s downtreams 128Kbit/s downtreams If i set DOWNLINK=512 UPLINK=128 UPLINK90=105 My final bandwith tested is: 40 Kbytes/s downstream and 9 Kbytes/s uptreams. So testing with diferent values i correct the problem using this: