Hello dear Catalin,
Well the only mistake you made is that you placed hte mark filters on
the output of the interface.
I suggest you to park them in the PREROUTING chain and not in the
output. It works fine to me.
Best regards
Stamatis
Catalin Borcea wrote:
Hello,
I have a Linux box with 3
Hello,
I tried to mark the packets in the PREROUTING chain but still doesn't work.
Now the packets are no marked anymore when they go out by the eth2
interface. When I marked them in the OUTPUT chain they arrived also to the
eth2 interface but marked. According to the docs the PREROUTING chain is
Well catalin, try to add theese rules with the in the prerouting chain
but bind theese rules with the interfaces you have.
Without binding netfilter rules with interfaces it will not work, and
you'll get the results you allready got.
Catalin Borcea wrote:
Hello,
I tried to mark the packets in
But how can I bind these rules to a interface when I don't know to what
interface the locally generated packets will arrive? In fact, this is the
purpose of marking the packets: to route them to the ppp0 interface.
- catalin -
- Original Message -
From: ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then you have to bind theese rules to both of your ethernet interfaces
assuming that the smtp traffic you want to mark arrives on both of your
ethernet interfaces.
To do that you have to specify netfilter rules once for your first
interface and once for your second interface.
I know that it
Hi,
My friend uses ipchains with kernel 2.4.21 :) It's funny but it's true. The
problem is that he marks the packets and after this the tc filter doesn't
catch them.
ipchains -A input -s 192.168.1.41/28 -j ACCEPT -m 0x2 -t 0xff 0x2
ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.41/28 -j MASQ -m 0x2
ipchains
I again.
I have the following statements:
#Initializing traffic control...
tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1:0 htb
#Loading queue disciplines for plis230 network...
tc class add dev br0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit
#Loading queue disciplines for pmad048 network...
tc class
Christian == Christian Stüllenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Julian == Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Christian I've got a problem to set up a configuration that shoud
Christian allow to route packets that come in over a certain
Christian interface(s) IF1 that
have u tried putting it on the FORWARD chain??
K
But how can I bind these rules to a interface when I don't know to what
interface the locally generated packets will arrive? In fact, this is the
purpose of marking the packets: to route them to the ppp0 interface.
- catalin -
- Original
Catalin,
When I try to connect to a smtp port somewhere in the Internet, tcpdump show
me that these packets go to the eth2 interface (the main table default
route). I don't know where is my mistake but it seems that the marking in
the OUTPUT chain occurs AFTER and not BEFORE routing. Is this a
Hi Martin, Catalin, Chijioke,
This subject intrigues me greatly and is closely related to a post of
just a few days ago:
snip from my original post
+--++---+
| eth1 192.168.1.1 || 192.168.1.250 |
| eth1:1 192.168.1.101 |
On Sunday 13 July 2003 13:21, Radu Maurer wrote:
This is my first attempt at understanding lartc:
I want to throttle outgoing bandwidth fo a certain tcp port and leave
other traffic the way it was.
so I put a prio qdisc at the root of eth0 (dummy priomap since i want to
use filters to
On Sunday 13 July 2003 22:18, Esteban wrote:
Stef, Lartc people,
Hello, im using the above script for my network It works okay, the htb
assigns the BW i want for outgoing traffic. But now, im looking foward
giving priority to the packets on the first class under the second, i mean
the first
On Thursday 17 July 2003 10:49, Vitor Carlos Flausino wrote:
I again.
I have the following statements:
Maybe this can help :
http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/41.html
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Linux as bandwidth manager
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
Hello,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Christian Stuellenberg wrote:
If traffic from zone MASQ is addressed to one of the external internet
addresses of one of the zone GOOD or DMZ, then it will currently get
routed directly at HOST. It is intended, that this direct routing is
not done, but
Hi everybody!
I am very glad to get htb test informationfrom www.docum.orgfor the htb
performance.
Today, I setup a bridge using brctl. my setup as
following:
192.168.2.26|
|
|
|-|
HTB+BR box | 192.168.2.18
|
eth0
|
| eth1
192.168.2.29
|
Hi everybody!
Today, I setup a bridge using brctl. my setup as
following:
192.168.2.26|
|
|
|-|
HTB+BR box | 192.168.2.18
|
eth0
|
| eth1
192.168.2.29
|
|
|
I want to limit the traffics when i download data from
192.168.2.18 to 26
Hello,
Change the ceil parameter to suit the maximum value of bandwidth on
that link. Check and get back to us.
Trevor
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 06:28, tanxuey wrote:
Hi everybody!
I am very glad to get htb test information from www.docum.org for the
htb performance.
Today, I setup a
Hi, I have redhat9 with kernel with 2.4.21 (final release)
info CHANGES
a.. updated kernel version example in tcng/README from 2.4.20 to 2.4.21
b.. setup.klib is now compatible with 2.4.21 (final release) (by Dimitry
Ketov)
c.. fixed setup.klib compatibility with old kernels, like 2.4.3
But
Hi, All
It's OK, sure tcng-9f cannot be compiled on RedHat 9, you must down grade
your sed, i down grade with sed-3.02-13.i386.rpm from RedHat-8.0 for i386
package, and it compiles OK
Regard,
.:: Cahyo ::.
- Original Message -
From: Dwi Cahyo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Martin A. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chijioke Kalu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] OUTPUT chain marking after or before routing?
Catalin,
When I try to connect to a smtp
21 matches
Mail list logo
