Sirs,
I am a newbe jumping to advance routing and traffic control. I work for
one of the leading isp in kingdom of Nepal. My goal is to do bandwidth
management for our lease line customer so that they could use their
allocated bandwidth only. Bgp and ospf is implemented as a routing
protocol. All
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 09:41, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Hello Rio Martin,
> : I want to shape both incoming and outgoing traffic with HTB. Since the
> : first time i applied HTB, i only limit incoming traffic from internet,
> : while the outgoing traffic is unlimited and now these days my outgo
Hello Rio Martin,
: I want to shape both incoming and outgoing traffic with HTB. Since the
: first time i applied HTB, i only limit incoming traffic from internet,
: while the outgoing traffic is unlimited and now these days my outgoing
: traffic really getting higher.
:
: INTERNET - et
Dear all,
I want to shape both incoming and outgoing traffic with HTB.
Since the first time i applied HTB, i only limit incoming traffic from
internet, while the outgoing traffic is unlimited and now these days my
outgoing traffic really getting higher.
INTERNET - eth0 | BW.MANAGER | eth1 -
Hi all!!!
I do not know why my letter was sent back again and
again!!!
Trever said my
ceil value was wrong!!!
My test enviroment is local ethernet network, computer 18 has 10Mbit
network card, and HTB+BRIDGE box has two 100Mbit network card,computer
29 and 26 have 100Mb
Hi:
Is there a way to retime a flow in order to compensate for jitter? For
example, RTP has timestamps which would enable retiming. Or you could
be simpler and just make the exit interval equal to the average intrance
interval. I'm sure there are even better ways that I just haven't
thought of.
I found what the problem was.
Insted of br0 in configurations, if I use eth0 it works (hum... queer).
Thkx any way,
-vcf
Stef Coene wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2003 10:49, Vitor Carlos Flausino wrote:
I again.
I have the following statements:
Maybe this can help :
http://www.docum.org/st
You just might get more beta testers if you'd provide them with a URL.
Being helpful to others isn't, insofar as I know, a violation of the Linux
ethic.
--Carol Anne
Chijioke Kalu wrote, in part...
>Alex Clouter of LARTC, just submitted a new QoS management tool using
ESFQ,
>for beta-testing, so f
|Hi, Chijioke,
|
|Do you have a link?
|
]- yep a link will be good...
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi, Chijioke,
Do you have a link?
Best regards,
Leonardo Balliache
At 07:49 a.m. 20/07/03 -0700, you wrote:
Lo All,
Linux is Catching up with Cisco in VoIP traffic management.
Alex Clouter of LARTC, just submitted a new QoS management tool using ESFQ,
for beta-testing, so far its working well
Started one on http://intserv.sourceforge.net/, any comments and
feedback are welcome.
Dimitry.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Yes I agree with you regarding zero queue size. I plan
to make patch similar to your proposal. I hope it will
be today.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > devik
> devik wrote:
> >>>If you read comment above htb_dequeue_tree, it should be called
> >>>only when it is sure that there are packets inside of the level/prio.
> >>>It is known by other HTB mechanism (per-level activity lists).
> >>>
> >>>Thus the bugtrap is to catch case where class was inserted
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
