Johan,
: I am learning tcng without having experiance of tc and I am trying to
: build something that shall schedule traffic dependent on the value in
: the IPv4 packets ip_ttl field.
:
: I have read the tcng reference manual and cannot find information about
: forwarding. Is it possible to
Hello again,
: Martin, as you can see in my last post i have route to 10.0.0.1 in the
: main routing table , so i have ping to the gateway but i can't connect
: to inet.
OK. So, you can ping the gateway.can you ping the gateway from the
source IPs you want to have Internet access?
But, b
Hi there Robert,
: I have snipped out part of a script to load balance and bandwidth shape
: upload traffic to a NIC (eth0/ETH_WAN) on a 2mbit/256kbit ADSL line.
: The balancing will be carried out for 3 users with 1+ PCs connected on
: another NIC. There are iptables instructions (not shown i
Darryl Miles wrote:
# Match the IP address of the VPN tunnel endpoint, however if you are
on DSL
# with dynamic IP then you might as well scrap this value, otherwise
change
# "0.0.0.0/0" to just "10.0.0.something/32" or remove
Opps...
to just "24.239.167.x/32", the point is if you are on dyn
Greg Freeman wrote:
Thank you Darryl,
Hopefully the below will help clarify.
(below was run on the site1 firewall) Does the RX line look bad to you
for Eth0?
ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:CF:01:A6:52
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
I have snipped out part of a script to load balance and bandwidth shape upload traffic
to a NIC
(eth0/ETH_WAN) on a 2mbit/256kbit ADSL line. The balancing will be carried out for 3
users with 1+
PCs connected on another NIC. There are iptables instructions (not shown in the
script) to mark
pac
On Thursday 04 December 2003 21:44, Mihai Vlad wrote:
> I left out the burst parameter so that HTB would compute it.
>
> The 80k burst parameter was my approach to prioritze somehow page browsing
> against heavy downloads. I said that 80 kilos is the average size of a html
> page.
>
> Is there any
On Thursday 04 December 2003 21:57, Greg Freeman wrote:
> Removed all the isolated, latency result was the same. Tried the new
> rule(s) on the site1 and again had a latency of 318ms. However, dropped
> packets increased to the highest I have seen it... 17%. The min latency
> was 30ms, the max w
Removed all the isolated, latency result was the same. Tried the new
rule(s) on the site1 and again had a latency of 318ms. However, dropped
packets increased to the highest I have seen it... 17%. The min latency
was 30ms, the max was 881ms
-Original Message-
From: Stef Coene [mailto
I left out the burst parameter so that HTB would compute it.
The 80k burst parameter was my approach to prioritze somehow page browsing
against heavy downloads. I said that 80 kilos is the average size of a html
page.
Is there any other way to accomplish this task. Is there a way to tell page
bro
Good guess, 10.0.0.7 is actually the VoIP phone system, which can
handle multiple calls. 10.0.1.20-22 are actually IP phones
I just pasted your other changes and was about to apply them. I will
try it first, then the below and let you know the results.
-Original Message-
From: Stef C
On Thursday 04 December 2003 21:24, Greg Freeman wrote:
> Stef,
> The current set of rules I have in it are as follows:
>
>
> tc qdisc add dev ipsec0 root handle 1: htb default 20
> tc class add dev ipsec0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbit ceil
> 640kbit burst 2k
> tc class add dev ipsec0 pare
Stef,
The current set of rules I have in it are as follows:
tc qdisc add dev ipsec0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev ipsec0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbit ceil
640kbit burst 2k
tc class add dev ipsec0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 240kbit
tc class add dev ipsec0 parent
On Thursday 04 December 2003 19:52, Mihai Vlad wrote:
> It's me again, with the same problem.
>
> I want to be able to split the bandwidth per IP, as I have 10 clients in my
> LAN and I want to be sure they get the same rate when downloading.
>
> I followed all the steps from the HTB manual, but th
On Thursday 04 December 2003 03:33, Greg Freeman wrote:
> I tried the following rules and had the same bad latency results for the
> corp site to remote site. Below are the rules I tried which gave the bad
> (avg. 350ms) latency:
>
> corp rules
>
> tc qdisc add dev ipsec0 handle 1: root cbq
Greg,
You do not say in your original article how your 640kbit/640kbit link is
attached, eth0, eth1 or pppX? If the interface is dedicated only for
WAN usage, or if the WAN be via a gateway? If your VPN endpoint hosts
are on the same or a different box to that with the 640kbit link.
You did
It’s me again, with
the same problem.
I want to be able to split
the bandwidth per IP, as I have 10 clients in my LAN and I want to be sure they
get the same rate when downloading.
I followed all the steps
from the HTB manual, but the script can be “beaten” when one uses
more connec
Good morning, Leon,
: I'm trying to setup my server to bandwidth control. Where we live
: bandwidth is very expensive and we need to closely monitor it. We'll
: buy 512kbps and this will have to be shared between 4 companies. Thus
: giving everybody a minimum if 128kbps but it must be burstabl
Hi all
Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced
routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet
interfaces in my Linux box.
Thansk in advanced
--
Guillermo Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
neotech
___
LARTC
Hi All,
I'm a newbie to Linux routing and I've read the HOWTO more times than I
care to remeber. Now I've managed to get simple rate limiting working on
my primary eth0 with no problem. However what I've got is as follows
eth0 is on 100Mbit
I'm running User Mode Linux so I've got say 5-10 tap in
Witaj Jan,
W Twoim liście datowanym 4 grudnia 2003 (13:01:51) można przeczytać:
Yes, you can. You can do marking in output and it will make a
difference in routing. Just use the -mangle- tables.
Checked and verified. I use it.
JG> Hi
JG> I want to do some routing an queuing stuff, but I am not
Hi
I want to do some routing an queuing stuff, but I am not sure if this
will work.
I have 3 connections on my router:
- eth0 which points to my LAN
- eth1 which point to the Internet over a 2Mbit connection
- eth2/ppp0 which is a DSL connection and points to the Internet, too.
The reason for t
Bandwidth and traffic priotization and throttling
Good day,
I'm trying to setup my server to bandwidth control. Where we live
bandwidth is very expensive and we need to closely monitor it. We'll buy
512kbps and this will have to be shared between 4 companies. Thus giving
everybody a minimum if 12
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm having some problems using HTB to prioritize traffic on my linux
> > router.
> > The main problem is as follows:
> > I have a 6Mbits channel on the metropolitan network and a 64kbps link
> > for the sites outside my country.
> >
> > These 64kbps are dynamically allocated by m
24 matches
Mail list logo
