Re: [LARTC] HTB filters - pls help me

2004-01-05 Thread hare ram
Hi Stef what happend if already existing people on the class so in the short gap time when we delete and add the rule, is the session will be disconects ? they will get maximum available throughput, when we remove and add, since the IP no more belong to any class but when i re-run the script,

RE: [LARTC] virtual interface

2004-01-05 Thread Aron Brand
Alen, : can i add HTB rule on virtual interface? : example: eth0:0 First, it's not really a virtual interface--it's just a convention from the old days of IP aliasing to have names like eth0:0. The IP exists and is active on an interface, eth0 in your case. The short answer is no. Traffic

Re: [LARTC] Ingress with WonderShaper

2004-01-05 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:42, Damion de Soto wrote: Hi Gavin, You're missing the INGRESS option in the kernel, you should have: CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS=y You'll need the NETFILTER kernel option turned on to be able to see/select the INGRESS option. You wonderful man :) I didn't even

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 02:55, Rio Martin wrote: Bobic having the problem similar to what i got with one of my server running kernel-2.4.20. All the interface i have are under the same brand (Realtek), eth0 would be for clients, eth1 for DSLCable, eth2 for Wireless 2.4Ghz. Weirdly, several of

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread Artras lajus
Gordan Bobic wrote: Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other things? -j SNAT your_ip man iptables ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:54, Gordan Bobic wrote: On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:28, Artras lajus wrote: Gordan Bobic wrote: Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other things? -j SNAT your_ip Or rather -j SNAT --to-source your_ip. I get it. I'll check if that

[LARTC] Cisco

2004-01-05 Thread Eddie
Hi I know this does not have anything to do with the list But I'm looking for books,doc's or anything on these Cisco exams I looking to do them this year.Please CCNP Exams Recommended Training Required Exam(s) Recommended Training 642-801 BSCI Building Scalable Cisco Internetworks v2.0 (BSCI)

Re: [LARTC] virtual interface

2004-01-05 Thread Roy
There is no need to use imq ant everything is easy to do anyway interface name is usefull only to attach qdisc to something and that all you need to clasify packets by source or destination ip antway if you have idea how to use imq there then just use your interface instead. also why it is so

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:28, Artras lajus wrote: Gordan Bobic wrote: Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other things? -j SNAT your_ip Or rather -j SNAT --to-source your_ip. I get it. I'll check if that works better than masquerading. Thanks. Gordan

Re: [LARTC] Load balancing with failover

2004-01-05 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Friday 02 Jan 2004 3:59 pm, Jurrie Overgoor wrote: Put a script to monitor a gateway with crond job and if it fails automatically change to gateway 2, you gotta it? Does that address the problem of routes being cached? ip route flush cache Gordan

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread andybr
Hi all, I dont understando what the problem is, can you explain so i can help you out. []´s Anderson On Monday 05 Jan 2004 02:55, Rio Martin wrote: Bobic having the problem similar to what i got with o ne of my server running kernel- 2.4.20. All the interface i have are under the same

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 8:32 pm, andybr wrote: Hi all, I dont understando what the problem is, can you explain so i can help you out. 2 interfaces, eth2 and eth3. ip rules ip route are set up correctly. Yet, for some reason, there are packets coming out of eth2 with the IP address of eth3 and

[LARTC] Bandwidth Control Tolerances

2004-01-05 Thread Patrick Turley
I have measured the performance of HTB with iperf and found it to be very close to expected (i.e., within 5%). I have a colleague who is measuring the performance by ftp'ing large files and recording the time required to make the transfer. He is seeing an average throughput that is nearly 10% away

[LARTC] Intermediate Interface?

2004-01-05 Thread John Hanlon - Central Coast Internet
Is there a way to force ingress traffic into appearing as egress traffic for the purpose of traffic shaping. e.g. eth0 -- TestMachine --- lo - TestMachine - eth1 Can you use a loopback or similar interface so that it appears that the data is being sent out and

Re: [LARTC] Multihomed Masquerading, routing and iptables

2004-01-05 Thread Rio Martin
On Monday 05 January 2004 19:06, Gordan Bobic wrote: On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:54, Gordan Bobic wrote: On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:28, Artras lajus wrote: Gordan Bobic wrote: Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other things? -j SNAT your_ip Or rather -j