Hi Stef
what happend if already existing people on the class
so in the short gap time when we delete and add the rule,
is the session will be disconects ?
they will get maximum available throughput, when we remove and add, since
the IP no more belong to any class
but when i re-run the script,
Alen,
: can i add HTB rule on virtual interface?
: example: eth0:0
First, it's not really a virtual interface--it's just a convention from
the old days of IP aliasing to have names like eth0:0.
The IP exists and is active on an interface, eth0 in your case.
The short answer is no. Traffic
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:42, Damion de Soto wrote:
Hi Gavin,
You're missing the INGRESS option in the kernel,
you should have:
CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS=y
You'll need the NETFILTER kernel option turned on to be able to see/select the
INGRESS option.
You wonderful man :) I didn't even
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 02:55, Rio Martin wrote:
Bobic having the problem similar to what i got with one of my server
running kernel-2.4.20. All the interface i have are under the same brand
(Realtek), eth0 would be for clients, eth1 for DSLCable, eth2 for Wireless
2.4Ghz. Weirdly, several of
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other
things?
-j SNAT your_ip
man iptables
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:54, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:28, Artras lajus wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other
things?
-j SNAT your_ip
Or rather -j SNAT --to-source your_ip. I get it. I'll check if that
Hi I know this does not have anything to do with the list
But I'm looking for books,doc's or anything on these Cisco exams
I looking to do them this year.Please
CCNP Exams
Recommended
Training
Required Exam(s)
Recommended Training
642-801 BSCI
Building Scalable Cisco
Internetworks v2.0 (BSCI)
There is no need to use imq ant everything is easy to do anyway
interface name is usefull only to attach qdisc to something and that all
you need to clasify packets by source or destination ip antway
if you have idea how to use imq there then just use your interface instead.
also why it is so
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:28, Artras lajus wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break other
things?
-j SNAT your_ip
Or rather -j SNAT --to-source your_ip. I get it. I'll check if that works
better than masquerading.
Thanks.
Gordan
On Friday 02 Jan 2004 3:59 pm, Jurrie Overgoor wrote:
Put a script to monitor a gateway with crond job and if it fails
automatically change to gateway 2, you gotta it?
Does that address the problem of routes being cached?
ip route flush cache
Gordan
Hi all,
I dont understando what the problem is, can you explain
so i can help you out.
[]´s
Anderson
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 02:55, Rio Martin wrote:
Bobic having the problem similar to what i got with o
ne of my server
running kernel-
2.4.20. All the interface i have are under the same
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 8:32 pm, andybr wrote:
Hi all,
I dont understando what the problem is, can you explain
so i can help you out.
2 interfaces, eth2 and eth3. ip rules ip route are set up correctly.
Yet, for some reason, there are packets coming out of eth2 with the IP
address of eth3 and
I have measured the performance of HTB with iperf and found it to be very
close to expected (i.e., within 5%). I have a colleague who is measuring the
performance by ftp'ing large files and recording the time required to make
the transfer. He is seeing an average throughput that is nearly 10% away
Is there a way to force ingress traffic into appearing as egress traffic
for the purpose of traffic shaping.
e.g.
eth0 -- TestMachine --- lo - TestMachine - eth1
Can you use a loopback or similar interface so that it appears that the
data is being sent out and
On Monday 05 January 2004 19:06, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:54, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 11:28, Artras lajus wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break
other things?
-j SNAT your_ip
Or rather -j
15 matches
Mail list logo