[LARTC] Fedora + TC

2004-01-07 Thread hare ram
Hi all iam trying to migrate from my QOS Services from RH 9.0 to Fedora i saw that fedora shipping with latest TC with HTB patch Does any one see any problem with this version some expert coment will be apprciate hare ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL

[LARTC] Multihome- routes patch problem

2004-01-07 Thread hare ram
Hi all iam trying to setup Dual gate using Julian patch DGD, but when i try tp patch to my kernel with fedora iam getting the following eroor can some one suggest me what is wrong or i need a latest patch for fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] patch -p1 < /root/update/update/routes-2.4.20-9.diff patchin

Re: [LARTC] Random ping jumps

2004-01-07 Thread Roy
I think it is your privider fault, Isnt your provider litnet? and you connected with some wlan card to debug it trace the patch (with traceroute or tracert) and try to ping the most near routers, this way you will easy find the problem > Hello, > >I've got this problem. There is an linux s

Re: [LARTC] TC rule numbering

2004-01-07 Thread Neilson Henriques
Do I can specify a handle or it is generated automatically by TC ? The main idea is let the application control these numbers instead of check the TC rule table ... - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Neilson Henriques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed

[LARTC] TC rule numbering

2004-01-07 Thread Neilson Henriques
Hello list, I'm developing an application that needs to number the TC rule (and keep it in a internal array table) to be possibly deleted later if its needed. I didn't find a easy way to do that and will be thankful if somebody can help me. Sorry if the question has

Re: [LARTC] Very sorry about the triple post (grrrr Outlook Express)

2004-01-07 Thread Barry Rooney
Yawn! - Original Message - From: "Patrick Turley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:08 PM Subject: [LARTC] Very sorry about the triple post (g Outlook Express) > > > ___ > LARTC mailing list /

[LARTC] Random ping jumps

2004-01-07 Thread Artūras Šlajus
Hello, I've got this problem. There is an linux server with 2.4.24 kernel and pinging from him to internet (or from lan) ping randomly jumps up: 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=387 ttl=59 time=30.0 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=388 ttl=59 time

Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1523 - 17 msgs

2004-01-07 Thread Stef Coene
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 10:43, Aron Brand wrote: > Hi Roy, > > It seems that I wasn't clear. Lets give an example. > > I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses > A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces. > A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address

Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth Control Tolerances

2004-01-07 Thread Stef Coene
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 19:02, Patrick Turley wrote: > This is, of course, very valuable feedback. Unfortunately, given the > responses I've had so far, I see that I didn't make it clear what I'm > really looking for. I also did some htb tests. I created scripts that uses iptables or tc counte

lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl

2004-01-07 Thread Stef Coene
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 07:20, Eddie wrote: > Good Day All > Just 2 questions on htb > > 1,My Wan link is on eth1 and my Lan on eth0,where do I put my htb on?I > want to limit web serving and ftp ens. eth1 for downloads from your web/ftp server eth0 for uploads to your web/ftp server > 2.Im g

[LARTC] Bandwith problem

2004-01-07 Thread Jurrie Overgoor
I recently suffer badly from low bandwith. At first I thought it was my Linux box, but after tracing the problem it turns out it was the ammount of double posts I get from Patrick Turley... :) Isn't there a way to block mail.rocksteady.com? It seems the mail originates from 10.50.23.3, and is forw

Re: [LARTC] Very sorry about the triple post (grrrr Outlook Express)

2004-01-07 Thread xxd
I agree, I am beginning to wonder if this is user error, or some malicious attempt by an idiot that is not P. Turley. Or even worse, some horrible new bug in M$ mail clients... On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:39:29 -0800 Steve M Bibayoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > H