[LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases

Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it (ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc rools ( tc qdisc add deveth0:0 root handle

[LARTC] kptd ipsec

hi all, could someone describe where the encryption de-encryption is in the kptd? thanks! charles ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases

On Friday 23 Jan 2004 09:15, Remus wrote: Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it ( ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc

RE: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases

Can you even shape on aliases? I thought you could only shape on the actual device. Why not shape on the source or destination IP? Mike. -Original Message- From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases

Yes: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07410.html search for the text alias bummer. Mike. -Original Message- From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP

[LARTC] IMQ Stability

Hello all, I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading posts on IMQ and it's apparent stability / instability. I have seen a number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to me about IMQ's stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps)

[LARTC] htbinit and redhat-9.0

dear All, I'm a new student and my job is too shapping bandwith for our campus faculty network. I want to implement htb with Redhat-9.0 distro. does this distro kernel support htb and tc good ? or i should apply some patch or upgrade kernel ? regards reza E0j)b b
mj)fjwlffX)Z9diZ(

Re: [LARTC] htbinit and redhat-9.0

On Friday 23 January 2004 18:38, Mohammad Reza wrote: dear All, I'm a new student and my job is too shapping bandwith for our campus faculty network. I want to implement htb with Redhat-9.0 distro. does this distro kernel support htb and tc good ? or i should apply some patch or upgrade

[LARTC] Set IP Options

Hi All, I'm trying to do something regarding Bandwith Aggregation and I would need to set new options in the IP-header. I had been studying some kernel source that concern to the IP layer, but I don't really know how to set a new option. Does anyone have any idea to add new custom options

[LARTC] Deleting tc filters

I have a fairly sophisticated bandwidth control tree. I am using filters to allocate traffic to various HTB buckets according to packet marks. Nothing about that is terribly hard. The problem is that my user population is dynamic. Users appear and disappear over time. Also, the priority to

[LARTC] sending same packet stream over both links

Hi, I have an application requirement that hints at the use of multicast, but I think it can be solved without it. |--- [Receiver 1] [Sender] --- [Relay/Router] | |--- [Receiver 2] There is a UDP stream