[LARTC] HTB dequeueing in pairs fixed

2004-01-30 Thread Andy Furniss
I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs, even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt. To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c . This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me with 256kbit/s up I used to see +90 sometimes, now it's +4

[LARTC] distributions

2004-01-30 Thread Mark Ryan
Is there a recent distro of linux that includes the kernel options needed to run wondershaper? I am trying to use Xandros 2.0 Desktop but the qos stuff is not compiled in...and I have been unsuccesful in re-compiling the kernel. I really want to use wondershaper and linux. Im afraid that I still

[LARTC] tc classes limit

2004-01-30 Thread Gerardo Arceri
This may be answered somewhere but i tried googling for it with no luck, so... What's the limit on number of traffic classes (classid) you can define on Linux ? -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ ___ LARTC maili

Re: [LARTC] FW: QoS extension to Net-SNMP

2004-01-30 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 30 January 2004 10:59, Heywood, Simon wrote: > Hi. > > I did send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]', but I suspect the list is a more > appropriate/useful place for it. It's a question about Michal Charvat's QoS > extension to Net-SNMP. > In other words, the handles don't seem to match those g

Re: [LARTC] two interfaces - borrowing bandwidth...

2004-01-30 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 30 January 2004 15:50, Michal Kustosik wrote: > Hello... > > I have one 2Mbit WAN interfaces and two vlan LAN interfaces - vlan2 and > vlan3. I'd like to limit bandwidth something like this: > rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan2 and > rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan3 > with possibility to borr

Re: Re:[LARTC] Whats wrong with my script?

2004-01-30 Thread Anderson O Muniz
If you want to set upload coming from eth0 for example: tc filter add eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src 192.168.0.50 classid 1:56 Try and let us know if it worked. Anderson - Original Message - From: "Gastón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "andybr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[

[LARTC] two interfaces - borrowing bandwidth...

2004-01-30 Thread Michal Kustosik
Hello... I have one 2Mbit WAN interfaces and two vlan LAN interfaces - vlan2 and vlan3. I'd like to limit bandwidth something like this: rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan2 and rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan3 with possibility to borrow bandwidth between vlan2 and vlan3. ^

[LARTC] balancing issues

2004-01-30 Thread Laura Garlando
Hello! I'd like to balance traffic from eth0 onto eth1 and eth2 going to different providers. As suggested on LARTC-howto, I've downloaded latest Julian's route patches (kernel 2.4.24) and I've set up everything as described on http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt (nano-howto). eth0 is the internal in

Re: [LARTC] Whats wrong with my script?

2004-01-30 Thread Gastón
What if I use public, routable IPs? i.e eth0: public eth1: public and client`s ips also public. - Original Message - From: "Damion de Soto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gastón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:16 AM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Whats wrong

[LARTC] Problems with ipp2p module not marking packets at all

2004-01-30 Thread GoMi
Hi there folks :) I installed the ipp2p module v0.5a (i had 0.4 as well) to classify p2p traffic. I have it loaded and working: Module Size Used byNot tainted ipt_ipp2p 2656 2 And i have the CONNMARK module to mark traffic: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTIN

Re: [LARTC] HTB_Tool

2004-01-30 Thread Alexander Reelsen
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:34:52AM +0200, Adrian Coman wrote: > The webpage is in Romanian ... but one can understand from the > configuration examples avaiable on the webpage and in the > http://sgi.rdscv.ro/~ionuts/htb-tools/htb_util-0.2.4-pre1_cv-1_quantum-1536-sin.tar.bz2 > > archive. Does

Re: [LARTC] Question(s) for the programming gurus

2004-01-30 Thread Lars Landmark
> That's simple. This way I don't have to touch each and every scheduler's > source that might be interesting now or in the future. And it is more in > the sense of "modularity" the tc framework was built on. Just throw in > the sch_stat, put it in the correct place of a "qdisc-hierarchie" and > yo

[LARTC] FW: QoS extension to Net-SNMP

2004-01-30 Thread Heywood, Simon
Hi. I did send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]', but I suspect the list is a more appropriate/useful place for it. It's a question about Michal Charvat's QoS extension to Net-SNMP. When I look at the MIB entries for the QoS handles, I get something like this - enterprises.qos.qosObjectTable.qosObject.

Re: [LARTC] wonder shaper problems

2004-01-30 Thread Mark Ryan
That is what i was afraid of. I have no idea how to re-compile the QoS modules into the Xandros kernel. Mark - Original Message - From: "Damion de Soto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 6:44 PM Subject: Re: [

Re: [LARTC] Prioritizing UDP Packets?

2004-01-30 Thread Sommarnatt
Quoting Damion de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sommarnatt wrote: > > > > I've downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: > > > > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ > >match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 > There is no flowid 1:3 in the defau

[LARTC] Multihome routing question

2004-01-30 Thread eduard
Hello, I am new to network routing and I need help configuring a linux box with two ethernet cards. In this case it's a Linux RH 7.3 box, in a cabinet that already has a couple of Windows servers. The Windows server routing is below as an example. The Linux box has an out-of-band interface at 10.

[LARTC] HTB_Tool

2004-01-30 Thread Adrian Coman
Hi, I just want to let you know of a tool that makes your HTB configuration very easy. Sorry if you already knew about it. The webpage is in Romanian ... but one can understand from the configuration examples avaiable on the webpage and in the http://sgi.rdscv.ro/~ionuts/htb-tools/htb_util-0.2.4

[LARTC] IMQ or shaping tx on 2 NICs?

2004-01-30 Thread tc
hi all, i have tried out both IMQ and shaping transmit on 2 NICS downstream and upstream respectively, which method is preferred in terms of accuracy, stability etc pls advise tc ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/

Re: [LARTC] Prioritizing UDP Packets?

2004-01-30 Thread Damion de Soto
Sommarnatt wrote: I've downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 There is no flowid 1:3 in the default script. was that supposed to be 1:30 ? I'm now quite sure about eve

Re: [LARTC] Whats wrong with my script?

2004-01-30 Thread Damion de Soto
Gastón wrote: What about this? : tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.50 classid 1:56 Is this correct for shaping upload? On your upload (eth0) interface, you can't use private IPs, because they've already been natted to real ones (see http://www.docum.