Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
attachment: body.zip
On Saturday 31 January 2004 02:40, Andy Furniss wrote:
I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs,
even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt.
To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c .
This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me
I'll take a stab at this . . .
Try a traceroute to your ISP's DNS server or even the ISP's gateway to
you. (This is the next hop beyond your onsite gateway to the world.)
This will tell you what interface your stuff chooses when you want to go
out to the public Internet. Also check your
On Friday, 30 January 2004, at 19:40:44 -0300,
Gerardo Arceri wrote:
What's the limit on number of traffic classes (classid) you can define on
Linux ?
Digging in the source code of Linux kernel 2.6.1 it seems that internal
data structures for the classful queuing disciplines use a u32
Mark Ryan wrote:
Is there a recent distro of linux that includes the kernel options needed to
run wondershaper?
I am trying to use Xandros 2.0 Desktop but the qos stuff is not compiled
in...and I have been unsuccesful in re-compiling the kernel.
I really want to use wondershaper and linux. Im
Stef Coene wrote:
Devik told me that disabling hysteresis will give you more accuracy, but you
will loose speed. I had to disable hysteresis when I did some bursts tests.
http://docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/36.html
Maybe this could be set as kernel option and not by editing .c file in next
On Jan 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I try to shape dhcp requests, but filter rule don't work. My script is:
[snipped]
I really think you have other problems if you need to shape DHCP requests and
their responses. If we overlook the logistical part (QoS under linux only
see's IP
On Jan 31, Art??ras ??lajus wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
Devik told me that disabling hysteresis will give you more accuracy, but
you will loose speed. I had to disable hysteresis when I did some bursts
tests.
http://docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/36.html
Maybe this could be set as
Hi there,
I have two questions:
1)
In the following setup:
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 128Kbit
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:10 classid
Stef Coene wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2004 02:40, Andy Furniss wrote:
I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs,
even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt.
To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c .
This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case
Alexander Clouter writes:
On Jan 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I try to shape dhcp requests, but filter rule don't work. My script is:
[snipped]
I really think you have other problems if you need to shape DHCP requests and
their responses. If we overlook the logistical part (QoS
On Jan 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I manage lan network with more that 1000 home users. Every user have
iptables/tc pairs for marking packets/traffic limiting. Entire network
operate via dhcp. If I miss only one user from shaper then his traffic
going to default class. This class must
Thanks for the suggestions. I noticed that traceroute just gives me a
timeout on the first hop (the local gateway). In a similar test on the
working machine, the local gateway responds perfectly well. Same result is
given with lft tracing agent.
Furthermore, in a frenzy to try to correct this
13 matches
Mail list logo
