Hi Mathew
I was not understand
is that what you saying
I need to use any one of the Patch
iptables-1.2.9-layer7-0.4.1.patch
This above patch for Marking the Packets with Iptables right ?
layer7-kernel2.4patch-qos-0.4.1b
this Patch is for TC to work with layer 7 aplication
so what did iam d
Hi
thanks for the quick reply
iam using the following things
iptables-1.2.9-layer7-0.4.1.patch
layer7-kernel2.4patch-qos-0.4.1b
i did the proceedure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl]# patch -p1 <
/root/update/layer7-kernel2.4patch-qos-0.4.1b
patching file Documentation/Configure.he
Hi,
I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have
roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get
225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes).
What should the settings in wshaper?
I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traff
Alexander Clouter wrote:
Well its being maintained by me if that what you are asking :)
However most of the people here 'poo-poo' it so do not expect much help from
them :-/ So much for my contibution to the OSS worldpah...every man to
themselves.
How could they :-)
To LinuX_Kid Re your im
On Monday, 02 February 2004, at 11:26:48 +,
Alan Ford wrote:
> They can route from the public to the private blocks, because they get to
> the router and the router knows to send it down the IPIP tunnel. But how
> can I configure the router at the other end to know to send responses
> from the
Well its being maintained by me if that what you are asking :)
However most of the people here 'poo-poo' it so do not expect much help from
them :-/ So much for my contibution to the OSS worldpah...every man to
themselves.
/me goes back to his ppp-pipe
have fun
Alex
On Feb 02, ThE LinuX
Hi
sombody know what is happen with
Jim diGriz's QoS Script Web Page ?
www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script
Regards
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Interesante !!
lo probaste con 2.4 ? o 2.6 ?
-> -Mensaje original-
-> De: Esteban Ribicic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Enviado el: Lunes, 02 de Febrero de 2004 08:11 p.m.
-> Para: 'ThE PhP_KiD'
-> Asunto: RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p
->
->
-> Probaste layering 7 matching?
->
->
-> -Me
Hello
I'm trying the excelent IMQ patch for
iptbles and kernel 2.4.21 and works
very well...
but, there is a IMQ patch for 2.4.24 ?
I've tested IMQ for kernels > 2,4,21 but
patch fails !
Best regards
andres
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michal.
Now I'm testing ipt_ipp2p netfilter 3rd module
You can reach it at:
http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html
At the momment I've not problems with it.
(It's works well)
But I haven't tested ipt_ipp2p module strongly
with a large LAN
regards
Andres.
-> ok ;) I have
Michal Charvat wrote:
> But as I see yours output I have one question. Do you have x86
> platform? I didn't try that on other than x86 and there can be
> problem with __u32 interpretation.
No, it's all x86.
Anyway, I think I've solved the problem - the numbers I've got out of SNMP
and conver
Yes, it compiled OK for me on RH 7.3
Alexander Reelsen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:34:52AM +0200, Adrian Coman wrote:
The webpage is in Romanian ... but one can understand from the
configuration examples avaiable on the webpage and in the
http://sgi.rdscv.ro/~ionuts/htb-tools/htb_util-0.2
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 11:10:43PM +0100, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote:
> On Sunday, 01 February 2004, at 17:09:39 +,
> Alan Ford wrote:
>
> > My problem is routing from *public* addresses on network A to *private*
> > addresses on network B, or vice versa. (Private <-> private is fine).
>
>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Eddie wrote:
> Ok
> What I did was blocking all forwarding,in and out, traffic on my gateway
> with iptables.Only allowing establish related traffic in and out ports
> thy use,80,25,110 ens.This will stop it connecting to a weard port
> Now the thing about
Read the Nano-howto, yo might find some info...Thats only for multipath
gateways, but... :)
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Eddie
Enviado el: lunes, 02 de febrero de 2004 12:20
Para: lartc
Asunto: [LARTC] adsl on/off
Good day all
Now I'm fro
Good day all
Now I'm from South-Africa,here we have adsl router/modems
You set the router to do the dialup and authentication and the set it as
your gateways box's gateway.Now sometimes the links gets drop and is off
for a while.Are there any way,for linux,my gateway of letting me now
that the link
Ok
What I did was blocking all forwarding,in and out, traffic on my gateway
with iptables.Only allowing establish related traffic in and out ports
thy use,80,25,110 ens.This will stop it connecting to a weard port
Now the thing about kazaa is the after it tryed all 65XXX ports it
will try in po
Hi !
I have working qos configuration made with htb, imq, imqnat, iptables,
nat etc. I'm thinking over how to shape incoming and outgoing traffic,
not using all not maintaind patches for kernel, iptables etc.
What do You think about below conf.:
INTERNET -- NAT_BOX -- QoS_BOX -- LAN
On QoS_BO
On Feb 02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Moment, DHCP is not arp packet.
> and ARP is not DHCP.
>
however every dhcp request fires off a bunch of ARP requests. I am
suggesting using DHCP-relay so you put the 'long distance' DHCP requests into
a kind of IP tunnel (?). If this is not true then y
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:27:25PM -0300, ThE PhP_KiD wrote:
> Hi List !
>
> I'm trying excelent module ipt_p2p from Filipe
> Almeida in a Linux Box with several connections,
> in order to block p2p traffic with next rule:
>
[...]
> how ever, I've noted that after two days running,
> that Linux
Claudiu Pruna wrote:
1)
I have observed that if the user whois ip is going to class 1:11 has
more threads, that that fro9m class 1:12 then, there is no more fairness
in borrowing, so that user with 1:11 gets almost all the unused
bandwidth from the parent ( going up to 96Kbit/s ).
well htb
> > ). There going dhcp conversation. If missed user start to
> download, entire
> > network lose dhcp server becouse of dropped packets.
Moment, DHCP is not arp packet.
and ARP is not DHCP.
DHCP is always IP addressed /check via tcpdump/
so you can mark these addresses with tc without any proble
Hello
sorry continuation to the last mail
when make menuconfig
iam not able to see this options tooo
"Layer 7 match support" and "Child Level match support".
but i followed the proceedures mentioned in the docs
but i could not find this option
where did i went wrong.. iam not sure
some one gui
Hi
iam running FEDORA,
i have installed Source of iptable 1.2.9 with the patch layer7-iptables
patch done with out any errors
and i applied patch in kernel to the layer 7 patch
and i have select the required option by doing
make menyconfig
done
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make module
24 matches
Mail list logo