[LARTC] HTB config

2004-02-11 Thread Leandro Andrade Travaglia
Hi all, how can i set one range of ip's from my local network to have higher priority over the rest ? I konw that the Whonder Shaper already have the opposite - the selected ip get the lowest prio. Thanks you all. Best Regards, LEANDRO TRAVAGLIA - Brazil Hi all, how can i set one range

[LARTC] marking packets not functioning well

2004-02-11 Thread Gyula Szekely
hello, Here's my problem in short. I have 3 subnetworks in my LAN (eth1 - internal interface, eth0 - external), and my ISP has also 2 subnetworks (link speed at 11Mbps), let's say: ISP1= 19x.2xx.25x.0/24 ISP2= 19x.2xx.25y.0/24 I want the traffic to the 2 subnets of the ISP be much higher than

Re: [LARTC] marking packets not functioning well

2004-02-11 Thread Corey Hickey
Gyula Szekely wrote: hello, Here's my problem in short. I have 3 subnetworks in my LAN (eth1 - internal interface, eth0 - external), and my ISP has also 2 subnetworks (link speed at 11Mbps), let's say: ISP1= 19x.2xx.25x.0/24 ISP2= 19x.2xx.25y.0/24 I want the traffic to the 2 subnets

Re: [LARTC] htb,iptables

2004-02-11 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 09 February 2004 15:00, eddieknows wrote: Hi all I'm sure you have heard this before but sorry.I wrote a script once and never looked at it again.An as my luck will have it I need it now and it is gone.I'm trying my best to rewrite it:-( My 1st question is: If my server is a

Re: [LARTC] htb: class isn't work conserving ?!

2004-02-11 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 09 February 2004 20:50, Patrick Turley wrote: I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in /var/log/messages: Feb 9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn't work conserving ?! The class it's referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can anyone

[LARTC] iproute2 and kernel 2.6.1/2

2004-02-11 Thread Dale Gallagher
Hi there I've searched the archives and googled for a solution with no success - has anyone successfully built iproute2 under kernel 2.6.1, or 2.6.2? I've tried various releases, each compile aborting with different errors. If this is wishful thinking at this stage, does anyone have a suitable

[LARTC] esfq htb

2004-02-11 Thread Alex
Hi, I just upgraded to kernel 2.6.2 patched with IMQ-NAT patch ESFQ from Jim diGriz's QoS Script and now I need to patch iproutefor esfq and the latest HTB patch. I grabbed iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I applied the folowinf patches: iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007-esfq.diff and

Re: [LARTC] iproute2 and kernel 2.6.1/2

2004-02-11 Thread Corey Hickey
Dale Gallagher wrote: Hi there I've searched the archives and googled for a solution with no success - has anyone successfully built iproute2 under kernel 2.6.1, or 2.6.2? I've tried various releases, each compile aborting with different errors. Compilation works fine for me with Debian

[LARTC] limiting my ftp upload speed

2004-02-11 Thread mark ryan
Will the following commands limit my ftpserver upload speed on the passive ports? iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -m tcp -p tcp -s 192.168.1.101 --sport 5:6 -j MARK --set-mark 0x02 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate

[LARTC] iproute2 and kernel 2.6.1/2

2004-02-11 Thread Dale Gallagher
Hi there I sent this earlier today, but haven't seen it on the list. I appologise if this ends up being a duplicate. I've searched the archives and googled for a solution with no success - has anyone successfully built iproute2 under kernel 2.6.1, or 2.6.2? I've tried various releases, each

Re: [LARTC] iproute2 and kernel 2.6.1/2

2004-02-11 Thread Corey Hickey
Dale Gallagher wrote: Hi there I sent this earlier today, but haven't seen it on the list. I appologise if this ends up being a duplicate. Hmm... they're getting here ok. Check the archives: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q1/thread.html -Corey

[LARTC] Latency low enough for gaming

2004-02-11 Thread Patrick Petersen
Welcome to me, and my very first lartc post. As with most first timers, i made a mistake. Admin, disregard the earlier message, as i was still waiting for the subscription confirmation. Should it get through still, i apoligize. For the last few weeks i have been trying to make it so our 2048/512

test

2004-02-11 Thread lartc
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. attachment: message.pif