Re: [LARTC] cant get FAIL-OVER to work...

2004-04-06 Thread Damion de Soto
Hi Cristiano, Hi all. Im having a problem that is driving me crazy. I cant get link fail-over to work in my RedHat9 Linux. ---snip- I want to be able to make the linux box do that for me. I already tried many load balancing sites, but still cant figure it out. I just gave up today, and i wan

[LARTC] cant get FAIL-OVER to work...

2004-04-06 Thread Cristiano Soares
Hi all. Im having a problem that is driving me crazy. I cant get link fail-over to work in my RedHat9 Linux. I have two ADSL lines exactly the same speed, and im doing NAT with the linux box. Whenever the first line (eth2 in my case) goes down, i run a bash script that i made to change the d

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem

2004-04-06 Thread huffo
Anyone knows a pdf, text, html that explains how /etc/gateway, or gated.conf works? I installed gated, configured rip1 and now is working, but i want to know everything about... Thanks any help, _ Voce quer um iGMail protegido contra v

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem

2004-04-06 Thread huffo
I installed gated to resolve my routing problem. It wa s a RIP problem. Thanks a lot, Mauricio. Em 07 Apr 2004, Damion de Soto escreveu: >Hi Pereira, >> i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing >> problem (?). >> >> eth0: external interface >> eth1: internal

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem

2004-04-06 Thread Damion de Soto
Hi Pereira, i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing problem (?). eth0: external interface eth1: internal interface. Both ip address are valid. Anyone can help me to find where is the problem? I think it´s a routing problem, but i don´t know where it is... Has yo

Re: [LARTC] Can I give more bandwidth to a specific URL

2004-04-06 Thread Jason Boxman
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 05:17, Martin A. Brown wrote: > If you are just starting out with traffic control under Linux, I strongly > recommend learning and using tcng from the beginning. The control > language offered by tcng (although technical) is much more like English or > human language than

[LARTC] tc tool source

2004-04-06 Thread Reed Zhou
Hi,   For some reason I could not use binary tc tool on my target (For example, when I run "tc qdisc show dev eth0", I got "RTNETLINK answer: Invalid argument"). It might be due to mismatch between the kernel and the tool, so I'd like to recompile tc tool together with the kernel. Where I can

Re: [LARTC] medir trafico

2004-04-06 Thread Neilson Henriques
bandwidthd.sf.net - Original Message - From: "ThE LinuX_KiD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "lartc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:59 PM Subject: [LARTC] medir trafico > hola listeros! > > existe algun script webScript, proyecto, herramienta > o lo que sea, que sirva par

Re: [LARTC] medir trafico

2004-04-06 Thread rubens
ipac-ng Rubens On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, ThE LinuX_KiD wrote: > hola listeros! > > existe algun script webScript, proyecto, herramienta > o lo que sea, que sirva para medir el trafico total de una > lan, como para hacer reportes mensuales por host ? > > necesito hacer algo asi: > > > host

[LARTC] medir trafico

2004-04-06 Thread ThE LinuX_KiD
hola listeros! existe algun script webScript, proyecto, herramienta o lo que sea, que sirva para medir el trafico total de una lan, como para hacer reportes mensuales por host ? necesito hacer algo asi: hostTrafico/mes - 192.168.1.x1x Byt

[LARTC] hashing rule don't match

2004-04-06 Thread ionut
Hi i have 2 class C 80.97.103.0/24 and 81.180.12.0/24 but i dont konw how to set hashing tables for HTB tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip u32 match src 80.97.103.0/24 hashkey mask 0x00FF at 12 link 1: but i want

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread Michael Vasilenko
devik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > remove cburst 1 thanks! class htb 1:5500 parent 1:2 leaf 5500: prio 0 quantum 65536 rate 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit burst 20Kb/8 mpu 0b cburst 8151b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 45107618 bytes 42138 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 608617bps 548pps backlog 40p lended: 42

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread devik
remove cburst 1 --- Martin Devera aka devik Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Michael Vasilenko wrote: > devik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I see you have cburst 0 ! It is not allowed > > and is described in docs.

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread Michael Vasilenko
devik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I see you have cburst 0 ! It is not allowed > and is described in docs. What was commands to > create the classes ? /sbin/tc.3 qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 2500 r2q 100 /sbin/tc.3 class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 200mbit ceil

Re: [LARTC] Can I give more bandwidth to a specific URL

2004-04-06 Thread Roy
So as I see you want to give priority to your own server. this is most simple case, and you should simply read tc manual, and give priority to that server ip address. another way is to use prio shaper on your router, then mark packets on desired servers with aproriate TOS, this way is better if

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem

2004-04-06 Thread huffo
Of course. IP_FORWARDING is enable for a long time. Pereira. Em 6 Apr 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: >Hi, >i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing >problem (?). > >eth0: external interface >eth1: internal interface. Both ip address are valid. > >Services

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread devik
I see you have cburst 0 ! It is not allowed and is described in docs. What was commands to create the classes ? --- Martin Devera aka devik Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Michael Vasilenko wrote: > devik ([EMAIL P

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread Michael Vasilenko
Michael Vasilenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > devik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > I suppose the drop you see is CPU bound ? Did you profiled it > > > > again ? > > > > > > No, CPU is about times more in idle state in htb3, and > > > 5x lowest data rate. AFAIK, htb3 scheduler is faster, so tha

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread Michael Vasilenko
devik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I suppose the drop you see is CPU bound ? Did you profiled it > > > again ? > > > > No, CPU is about times more in idle state in htb3, and > > 5x lowest data rate. AFAIK, htb3 scheduler is faster, so that is the > > reason of moving to htb3. > > ok then it is

Re: [LARTC] hashing

2004-04-06 Thread Catalin BOIE
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi i have 2 class C 80.97.103.0/24 and 81.180.12.0/24 but i dont konw how > to set hashing tables for HTB > tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 > tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip u32 match src 80.97.103.0/

[LARTC] Routing problem

2004-04-06 Thread huffo
Hi, i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing problem (?). eth0: external interface eth1: internal interface. Both ip address are valid. Services like DNS, HTTP is configured to run using eth1 ip address. The problem is when i try to connect from internet to fir

[LARTC] hashing

2004-04-06 Thread ionut
Hi i have 2 class C 80.97.103.0/24 and 81.180.12.0/24 but i dont konw how to set hashing tables for HTB tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip u32 match src 80.97.103.0/24 hashkey mask 0x00FF at 12 link 1: but i want

Re: [LARTC] Can I give more bandwidth to a specific URL

2004-04-06 Thread Martin A. Brown
Abdul, Good morning, Abdul. : > > Can I give more bandwidth to a specific URL. : > but you can easily give more bandwithch to some server : How can I Do it. : : > If you want to know more exactly how, : > then you should explain more exactly what you need : : WE have application servers i

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread devik
> > I suppose the drop you see is CPU bound ? Did you profiled it > > again ? > > No, CPU is about times more in idle state in htb3, and > 5x lowest data rate. AFAIK, htb3 scheduler is faster, so that is the > reason of moving to htb3. ok then it is config issue probably. you should pin it down to

Re: [LARTC] htb2 -> htb3 problems

2004-04-06 Thread devik
> I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me, > htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes), > kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation. > > So, I've moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking