Re: [LARTC] bandwidth controlling and monitering

2004-04-28 Thread Animesh Bansriyar
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 08:05, kaushalender1 wrote: Hi group, I am new to this group and linux.we have a linux box on which we are giving bandwidth to multiple customers..this box have two ethernet interface eth0 and eth1 .Eth0 is directly connected to internet and eth1 is connected to

[LARTC] HTB not obeying to specified rate?

2004-04-28 Thread Anton Glinkov
here is the situation i am using htb.init with fwmark to do QoS. i have 2 parent classes with RATE=CEIL which then have some leafs each on his own. the first one works fine (it shapes the packets to the specified rate) class htb 1:21 root rate 1Mbit ceil 1Mbit burst 2909b cburst 2909b Sent

Re: [LARTC] Split bursty bandwidth equally

2004-04-28 Thread Andy Furniss
Mihai Vlad wrote: Hello again, Is it possible to split a bandwidth equally among clients regardless of its current link speed? I have a link that can get bursty at times. At any given time the N active sessions (the ones with non-empty queues) need to be serviced simultaneously, each at a rate of

Re: [LARTC] newbie: TC[NG] with (256kbit/s down and 768kbit/s up) on a router

2004-04-28 Thread Christian Parpart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 26 April 2004 10:01, Andy Furniss wrote: On Sunday 25 April 2004 09:06, Andy Furniss wrote: Jason Boxman wrote: Egress is easy. Ingress seems to be a topic that is discussed often on LARTC, and I believe your options are to either use

[LARTC] Wondershaper stops limiting outbound traffic

2004-04-28 Thread Richard
I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I'm uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC=6881 6882 6883