HTB should give fifty-fifty to U1 and U3... but it is not...
What is happening is that HTB gives about 350-380kbit for user3 and
everything else(more than 600kbit) for user1... this period is marked
as t1 on my graph...
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on
Hi!
How does prioritization work when you've got a tree structure, e.g.
|
+-- class_a rate 64kbit prio 1
||
|+-- class_a1 rate 32kbit prio 1
||
|`-- class_a2 rate 32kbit prio 2
|
`-- class_b rate 64kbit prio 2
Above could either be interpreted as
(a) a, a1 have prio 1
Abraham van der Merwe wrote:
Hi!
How does prioritization work when you've got a tree structure, e.g.
I think the whole idea of linux QOS is that it dequeues up the tree
until it reaches the net interface. So effectively I think you evaluate
each leaf in turn on the way up the tree
If for
Another question:I am studying sch_htb.c,but it's so tough for to
understand,especially htb_dequeue().Would anyone please supply some adivse?
Hmm, well I will set you a problem. I have been looking at sch_htb.c as
well, but I don't understand the marked line below (won't it mean
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that
user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine
(ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it still remains (the
Uytkownik Abraham van der Merwe napisa:
Hi!
How does prioritization work when you've got a tree structure, e.g.
|
+-- class_a rate 64kbit prio 1
||
|+-- class_a1 rate 32kbit prio 1
||
|`-- class_a2 rate 32kbit prio 2
|
`-- class_b rate 64kbit prio 2
HTB means:
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings
around on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of
HTB that user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about
that machine (ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it
OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users.
Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this:
It's still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the
rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the
actual calculation of bytes in each
Hi All,
I have try to compile net-snmp with QoS patch from
http://x-ray.prokon.cz/data/snmp/ but got error, i have try many times
but still got the same result.
Anybody have the net-snmp package or binary, deb or rpm that already support
QoS ?
Many thnks
Regards,
Kris
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings
around on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of
HTB that user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about
that machine (ie if you swap ip's for
Hi,
I'm looking for a script in order to do
traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with
linux router.
Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven't much
bandwidth (512kbit).
Also, I've a squid cache and it works very good!
I've found Jim QoS script, and FairNat.
Which is more suitable for me ?
Jim
Hi,
if I want to block ALL p2p traffic, ( bit torrent and apple
included )... which is better ?
# iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p --bit --apple -j DROP
or...
# iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j DROP
# iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --bit -j DROP
# iptables
Uytkownik Ed Wildgoose napisa:
(see the htb_lookup_leaf function for details)
Hope that helps...
Hmm... My greatest C program was the most simple snmp client you can
ever imagine - and I was writing it for 2 weeks to finish my classes...
So I think it is not good idea for me to patch (or even to
Hi there,
I've got the following problem on my hand.
I'm a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5
different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own
ip range in the private network (10.4.0.0 10.5.0.0 and so on).
For all these schools we have an
Yeah, look into HTB. It makes this problem easy.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Peter Kaagman wrote:
Hi there,
I've got the following problem on my hand.
I'm a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5
different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own
Peter Kaagman wrote:
Hi there,
I've got the following problem on my hand.
I'm a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5
different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own
ip range in the private network (10.4.0.0 10.5.0.0 and so on).
For all these
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that
user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine
(ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the lower
handle class.
I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic setups
and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and CPU usage
and you say it gets better with more classes.
Andy.
Well -
On Friday 18 June 2004 07:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have try to compile net-snmp with QoS patch from
http://x-ray.prokon.cz/data/snmp/ but got error, i have try many times
but still got the same result.
I have compiled it without any problems. What errors did you receive? Did
Ben wrote:
Yeah, look into HTB. It makes this problem easy.
Ok thank you both... will look into that subject
Peter
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
pljosh wrote:
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the
lower handle class.
I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic
setups and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and
CPU usage and you say it gets better with more classes.
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users.
Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this:
It's still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the
rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the
actual calculation
Andy Furniss wrote:
I also have half your bandwidth - and it was set at 400kbit for the test.
I meant to say aswell, that if you are doing the tests on downloads you
need to throttle to about 80% of your rate, so you can build up queues
and have a bit of spare for latency.
Andy.
After a bit of messing about -
Patch would't apply and I couldn't see why. Then did it by hand and
had to move vars to top of function to get it to compile.
Hmm, perhaps it got corrupted because of the change in line endings when
I pasted it in on a windows machine? Piece of cake to apply
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
After a bit of messing about -
Patch would't apply and I couldn't see why. Then did it by hand and
had to move vars to top of function to get it to compile.
Hmm, perhaps it got corrupted because of the change in line endings when
I pasted it in on a windows machine? Piece
HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I did it, recompiled, launched... and i looks like it is even a little
bit worser: user1 has almost twice as much BW as user3...
I DO NOT GET IT
IT LOOKS LIKE HTB WORKS FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT ME :(
___
LARTC
On Friday 18 June 2004 20:18, ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a script in order to do
traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with
linux router.
Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven't much
bandwidth (512kbit).
Also, I've a squid cache and it works very good!
I've found Jim QoS
27 matches
Mail list logo
