Re: [LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

2004-06-21 Thread Jason Boxman
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 00:33, Mike Mestnik wrote: > I have a Cable 'modem' that has a problem that many of these devices is > bound to have. I was wondering what other lartc user thought about this > and if DSL has simular problems. Was there a question in here somewhere? > NO REALY MY CABLE M

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

2004-06-21 Thread Jason Boxman
On Monday 21 June 2004 06:04, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > >So does it just let you be honest about your rated speed, or is there an > > added performance bonus from being able to specify your true ATM rate? > > > So the patch simply works out how many cells you will need and > multiplies up by the real

Re: [LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-21 Thread Jason Boxman
On Monday 21 June 2004 13:36, Ralf Staudemeyer wrote: > Hi > > I have to manage a network with approx. 200 users, a 256kbit/s unmanaged > Internet connection and a 3Mbit/s unreliable managed Internet connection > (only http/ftp-proxy and ssh available). All users are in one Class C > Subnet with 51

[LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

2004-06-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
I have a Cable 'modem' that has a problem that many of these devices is bound to have. I was wondering what other lartc user thought about this and if DSL has simular problems. Cable, being Asymetrical, is able to upload at a given rate and hopefully has a buffer, in the modem, of some kind. Whe

[LARTC] HTB: 3. Sharing hierarchy

2004-06-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
On http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm... There is a nice explanation on how/why to setup a hierarchy with HTB. Howerver what is missing is how to setup finters for this case? I had this working when I was using a seperat qdisc for each ?layer?, making each HTB only one level deep

[LARTC] HTB: Packet header size option.

2004-06-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- On Wed, 05 May 2004 14:01:28 +0100 "Andy Furniss" Wrote: > I forgot to say - if you use DSL tweaking uprate right upto the limit > with bulk traffic may not be a good idea. There are atm overheads and > thay are greater (as %) for small packets eg. htb counts empy ack as 40 > bytes but it's

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

2004-06-21 Thread Damion de Soto
After further investigation I think you need the patch a little more like this for PPPoE and the params you gave (Andy do you think this looks OK?) Please let me know if this works for you. (As near as I can tell, there is no PPP overhead(?), and you then basically encapsulate your packets in

[LARTC] CBQ troubles, processor overload

2004-06-21 Thread Adam Towarnyckyj
Hey there everyone, I appreciated everyone's help so much in the last few posts I decided to post some more! :) We implemented our bandwidth management machine on the network last week and everything looked great. After looking at it today, anything past the machine is losing major

Re: [LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-21 Thread Ed Wildgoose
The Windows machines with their viruses give me a headache. I do not want to enforce remote Windows patching and virusscanner updating. It should also be taken into account that there is nearly no money available for any special equipment. Best would be to get this job done with a couple of old co

[LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-21 Thread Ralf Staudemeyer
Hi I have to manage a network with approx. 200 users, a 256kbit/s unmanaged Internet connection and a 3Mbit/s unreliable managed Internet connection (only http/ftp-proxy and ssh available). All users are in one Class C Subnet with 512 IP-Addresses. 60% of the machines are Windows. The rest are SUN

[LARTC] HTB patch - fairness

2004-06-21 Thread devik
Witold Szczerba spent his time evaluating fairness of borrowing. His troubles inspired me enough to analyze the problem: When a class changes from yellow to green it disconnects itself from parent's feedlist. Unfortunately it resets feed pointer to the first child. I created a patch where the class

[LARTC] IMQ + natin PREROUTING - it is almost 2 years since patch....

2004-06-21 Thread pljosh
Hello there! I was reading this archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ with nat in PREROUTING chain... From www.linuximq.org I've downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and what can i see? The line

Re: [Fwd: Re: [LARTC] /sbin/tc does not know about HTB]

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:30:15 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:20:16 +0100 > Ed Wildgoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It seems that the official place to grab the source for iproute2 is > > > http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/ bu

Re: [Fwd: Re: [LARTC] /sbin/tc does not know about HTB]

2004-06-21 Thread L Rotger
Ok, I'll try those tomorrow. Thanks! Ed Wildgoose wrote: Well I got mine from http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/ but I didn't even know about those 2.6 ones... I'm using the latest 2.4.7 with my 2.6.5 kernel quite happily (lots of patches) then I hope they apply OK to y

Re: [Fwd: Re: [LARTC] /sbin/tc does not know about HTB]

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:20:16 +0100 Ed Wildgoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems that the official place to grab the source for iproute2 is > > http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/ but there are only > > sources for 2.2 and 2.6, where are the ones for 2.4? > > > > Well I g

[Fwd: Re: [LARTC] /sbin/tc does not know about HTB]

2004-06-21 Thread Ed Wildgoose
It seems that the official place to grab the source for iproute2 is http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/ but there are only sources for 2.2 and 2.6, where are the ones for 2.4? Well I got mine from http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/ but I didn't even know ab

[LARTC] /sbin/tc does not know about HTB

2004-06-21 Thread L Rotger
This is my first post to the list so forgive me if this information is anywhere else. I've been using traffic shaping (cbq) for a while and i'd like to give htb a shot. I'm running debian woody (stable) with 2.4.24 with htb enabled. The problem is tc does not know about htb: # tc qdisc add dev et

[LARTC] tbf token help

2004-06-21 Thread mknific
Hi all! I just started to experiment with bandwidth management using tbf. I have the folowing problems with token understanding: 1) What unit is token? Is "1 token = 1 byte" ? If this is so, then with rate=0.5mbit and HZ=100 the bucket gets filled with 0,64kb (655 tokens) every 10ms? 2)

Re: [LARTC] Best method for filtering ACKs?

2004-06-21 Thread Stefan Gold
Am Sonntag 20 Juni 2004 15:22 schrieb Ed Wildgoose: > >I'm wondering which of these filters is the best method for filtering ACK > >packages to achieve lowest delay possible on a dsl-link. > > I think this is an excellent start for most stuff: > http://digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ That helped a l

Re: [LARTC] bandwidth shaping based on trafic on other host

2004-06-21 Thread Stef Coene
On Sunday 20 June 2004 19:33, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > Hi Folks, > > It's been 4 days since I posted a question and did not receive any > answer. Can you give me a hint if linux 'tc' 'iproute2' tools are > able to do what I need? > > I don't even know if they can do this and I should continue t

Re: [LARTC] Difference between flowid and classid

2004-06-21 Thread Catalin BOIE
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Vinu Chandran wrote: Hi all Can anybody pls explain me the difference between classid and flowid. In which scenario we may need to use either of one. Any help will be greatly appreciated. They mean the same thing. regards Vinoos. _

Re: [LARTC] Difference between flowid and classid

2004-06-21 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 21 June 2004 11:09, Vinu Chandran wrote: > Hi all > > Can anybody pls explain me the difference between classid and flowid. In > which scenario we may need to use either of one. Any help will be greatly > appreciated. classid and flowid is the same. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]  "Us

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

2004-06-21 Thread Ed Wildgoose
So does it just let you be honest about your rated speed, or is there an added performance bonus from being able to specify your true ATM rate? The idea is that your ethernet packets get broken up and encapsulated in 53 byte ATM packets. Each ATM packet is fixed size and has a 5 byte header

[LARTC] Difference between flowid and classid

2004-06-21 Thread Vinu Chandran
Hi all Can anybody pls explain me the difference between classid and flowid. In which scenario we may need to use either of one. Any help will be greatly appreciated. regards Vinoos. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.d

Re: [SPAM] [LARTC] Help:how to filter P bits and schedule??

2004-06-21 Thread Ed Wildgoose
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 required=4.0 tests=BODY_8BITS, DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN, MIME_BASE64_TEXT,MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY autolearn=no X-Spam-Report: * 1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters 1.1 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding * 1.4 DNS_FR

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

2004-06-21 Thread Jason Boxman
On Sunday 20 June 2004 09:16, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > Jason Boxman wrote: > >On Friday 18 June 2004 07:45, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > >>OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. > >>Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: > > > >Did I miss this the first time around? Th

Re: [SPAM] [LARTC] Help:how to filter P bits and schedule??

2004-06-21 Thread Patrick Petersen
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:07:36 +0800, "swcims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,All > I'd like to implement the function of "recognize and schedule traffic that > makes use of the P bit as defined in IEEE 802.1P" by iproute2/tc in mips linux > device.I think I should use iptables or u32 filt