I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches
up with quotation(") chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes
matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within
the same tc cmd.
I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,
I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches
up with quotation(") chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes
matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within
the same tc cmd.
I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 16:12, L Rotger wrote:
> Stef Coene wrote:
> > I never had a problem compiling tc with 2.4 kernel sources.
> > Buy why do you want to recompile tc?
>
> Well, I like being able to compile things from source. Besides, I'm
> installing this on a production server and would li
http://sourceforge.net/projects/l7-filter/
Providse and posibly replaces your project. Thay use regex(in kernel
space) to filter packets in much the same way you do. How ever regex is
not going into the kernel!
Here is a mail that describes the situation.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 10:12, L Rotger wrote:
> Stef Coene wrote:
> > I never had a problem compiling tc with 2.4 kernel sources.
> > Buy why do you want to recompile tc?
>
> Well, I like being able to compile things from source. Besides, I'm
> installing this on a production server and would li
Alessandro O. Ungaro wrote:
L Rotger,
you can update your libresolv updating your libc, it's may correct the
problem.
I have libc.so.6 but that didn't solve the problem.
L Rotger
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/l
Yes, I do understand the LARTC and wondershaper. As for ADSL-qos I
didn't, but I did read all the TCP rfcs regarding packet lose and
throughput negotiation, ect.
--- Ed Wildgoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yes, SwFC is lame. Howerver it would be a good band-aid, to have
> router
> >and mod
L Rotger,
you can update your libresolv updating your libc, it's may correct the
problem.
[]'s
x-arnie
L Rotger wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
I never had a problem compiling tc with 2.4 kernel sources.
Buy why do you want to recompile tc?
Well, I like being able to compile things from source. Besides
Stef Coene wrote:
I never had a problem compiling tc with 2.4 kernel sources.
Buy why do you want to recompile tc?
Well, I like being able to compile things from source. Besides, I'm
installing this on a production server and would like to rest assured
that the binary I use is good. Call me paran
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 16:08, ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
> sorrt, but same error...
>
> -> Try to execute
> -> export MIBS=ALL
> -> before you exectute snmpwalk. This will pick up all the mibs files and
> -> translate the numbers to text.
>
> this is my debug output from proces.pl
The export MIBS is on
Hi,
I am looking working (!) qdisc that would guarantee preferential treatment
to priority (ex voice traffic). It is supposed to work as LLQ (Cisco) which
means it is PQ but with bandwidth limited for EF PHB traffic.
I did lots of tests with CBQ and prio set to 1 for EF PHB and prio 2 for
best ef
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 06:19, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> On http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm...
> There is a nice explanation on how/why to setup a hierarchy with HTB.
> Howerver what is missing is how to setup finters for this case?
For more information and examples: http://docum.or
ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
hi !
this patch can work good with last tc release ?
which performance haves with rp-pppoe ?
I guess so.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 16:04, L Rotger wrote:
> I am trying to build iproute2-2.4.7-20010824 from source on a 2.4.24
> kernel. I have played a bit with ADDLIB and LDLIBS variables but I
> always get errors so I suppose it's best if instead of playing I try to
> understand what does the following m
hi !
this patch can work good with last tc release ?
which performance haves with rp-pppoe ?
bests
andres.
-> -Mensaje original-
-> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> nombre de Jason Boxman
-> Enviado el: Martes, 22 de Junio de 2004 02:17 p.m.
-> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
Hey,
I was fiddling with
wonder shaper and it works great, except in my situation I only have 1 real
network interface and the other interface is a virtual interface ie eth0:0, and
tc doesn't seem to support that. I have 2 subnets, one of which goes to the
router which then
If you're only trying to limit http data use the squid proxy server with
delay pools:
My delay pools config for the squid proxy server:
acl only64kusers src 192.168.40.0/255.255.255.0
acl geoff src 192.168.40.198
acl joel src 192.168.40.188
acl ellen src 192.168.40.197
acl jonolaptop src 192.168
> # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p --bit --apple -j DROP
> # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j DROP
> # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --bit -j DROP
> # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --apple -j DROP
It is exactly the same. If you don't care for packet/byte
Hello,
My name is Adam and I try to get PQ by means of CBQ. Sorry for writing about
such a problems but I struggle with this for 2 weeks .. I have searched the
LARTC archive till 2000 and everyone say using priorities lowers delay.. but
it does NOT.
I can NOT see ANY difference when using priorit
Yes, SwFC is lame. Howerver it would be a good band-aid, to have router
and modem syncronisation take place.
You have got to consider that some devices are asynchronous and some are
synchronous
The router(PC) has no idea of the buffer fullness, this is the underlying
problem! The cable mode
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 22:04, Guillermo Gomez wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm newbie on this and i would appreciate some pointers on how to limit
> the http trafic to my users from my linux-gateway box.
>
> Thanx in advance
--
Guillermo Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
neotech
__
21 matches
Mail list logo
