So the solution is to throttle incoming to 99.9% of total incoming
bandwidth. Well, actually since you have no control over who can send
you data, this only works in steady state. So perhaps you should make
it 95% or 90%. It depends whether you mind there being the odd blip
where someone
Hi
First I must say that I`am an author of HTB auto-configurator (so I know some about
QoS under linux) and I have read a lot of articles about HFSC, but I still don`t know
how to configure this algoritm properly. Maybe somone can help me and write a little
example for me (the best will be
Hello, i have a little problem and i would appreciate any help
I have 2 internet connections and i need a way to use them both
I use linux btw
first ip : 192.168.200.25 , gateway 192.168.200.1, ip on internet : 82.77.29.169
second ip : 212.146.71.5, gateway 212.146.71.1 ,ip on internet :
Have you each ADSL line connected to a NIC ethernet ?
You have 6 NIC ethernets ?
bests
andres
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Mark Coetser
Enviado el: Sábado, 03 de Julio de 2004 08:33 a.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [LARTC] load
Hi folks,
I read the fantastic LARTC How-to and after that i tried to limit one
host in my LAN for both down-and upload bandwidth usage.
I took section 15.9. and added uplink-limiting as I understood it from
the previous chapters.
Unfortunately it doesn't work.
I ran the script and went to the
Hi!
I'm trying to control the bandwidth usage of a filesharing client.
I've read a little bit of the LARTC HOWTO, but I'm not sure it gives me the
solution, or I can't see how it could give one.
I was thinking about the possibility to run the application in an artificial
environment
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:35:22AM -0400, Alfie Viechweg wrote:
Regarding building your own router/switch. You might want to check out
www.routerboard.com for a
really reasonably priced 4 port NIC.
I had no idea this type of board existed! (forgive my excitement)
Alfie, have you used the
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:51:40PM -0600, glen wrote:
Alfie, have you used the Routerboard 230 or 240 products?
Whoops, I meant 220 or 230 ...
Glen
--
**
Glen W. Mabey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/
Runs good on Linux and has many (perhaps too many) different extras.
Performance is sufficient for most cases unless you are working with data
rates of more than 30-40Mbit/s (well, IPsec with a kind of strong encryption
goes only with some 3-5 megabits...). You may want to check out the site
Stephan M. Ott wrote:
tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst
192.168.0.51 flowid 1:1
tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip src
192.168.0.51 flowid 1:2
Wild guess: You are trying to match a masqueraded IP address.
On your external
By the way, under Fedora Core 2, bridging + htb + tc filter works correctly
BUT tc show does not report rates correctly. I tested htb with several
subsidiary classes, each with ceil's and prio's and they all
borrowed/allocated/etc rates correctly as measured from outside hosts.
However, tc show
I also sent this to Stephan, hopefully I'm not too far offbase :-)
A.
1) It's sfq not sqf, you should be getting errors when your two lines are
not commented out
2) Your statement that commenting these lines out so that rate is always
limited makes no sense. Adding the sfq's does
Hello,
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Mohammad Reza wrote:
If one link is down, I except that routing will flush automatically
after 60 second. But this not happened. Keeping them alive with pinging
trick don't make any changes.
The 'ping' trick works for gateways which become
13 matches
Mail list logo
