Hello,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean that using NAT its impossible to do load balance or
this is the worng command? If its the wrong command, what´s
the right one?
Don't disappoint, you can check the following patches
and howtos:
I am planning a setup with thousands of classes in a HTB qdisc, say from
1:1000 to 1:2000, each with a very small rate and a big ceil, for fair
sharing of a 45mbit link.
I suspect some problems could be lurking in there.
Anyone having good/bad experience with such number of classes?
Simon
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:46:59AM +0200, Simon Lodal wrote:
I am planning a setup with thousands of classes in a HTB qdisc, say from
1:1000 to 1:2000, each with a very small rate and a big ceil, for fair
sharing of a 45mbit link.
Consider using HFSC. HTB is not the best solution for such
HFSC seems interesting, but does it really work well? I am not afraid of
new stuff, but bleeding edge is probably too risky.
That HTB problem, I guess you mean it is possible to have available
bandwidth, but when some of it has been distributed between users, all
users' ceils go below their
I'm looking for a way to configure a qdisc or filter to drop all packets.
The logic behind this is that I'm using the u32 hashing tables to get move
my filters from iptables to tc filters. This will translate into much less
per-packet processing for me. However, I need a way to drop any packets
Cytowanie Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean that using NAT its impossible to do load balance or
this is the worng command? If its the wrong command, whats
the right one?
Don't disappoint, you can check
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:14:09PM +0530, Sanjay Arora wrote:
LARTC HOWTO
2.2. Prior knowledge
Link:
Rusty Russell's networking-concepts-HOWTO
Not Found
The requested URL
/~rusty/unreliable-guides/networking-concepts-HOWTO/index.html was not
found on this server.
Just FYI.
hello list,
i have a small question regarding the imq patch from www.linuximq.net
by default it makes only 2 devices. how can i add interfaces (imqX)?
applying the patch to a linux kernel doesn't let me build it as a module.
thanks in advance,
adrian
On 27 August 2004 pm 15:46, Simon Lodal wrote:
I am planning a setup with thousands of classes in a HTB qdisc, say from
1:1000 to 1:2000, each with a very small rate and a big ceil, for fair
sharing of a 45mbit link.
I suspect some problems could be lurking in there.
Anyone having good/bad
HI,
I want to set interface to promisc mode and do all routing with iptables.
Is it somehow possible? as I see now kernel do not pass everything to
ipables.
Basicaly I want to ignore ethernet addess and use only ip for routing.
I suppose this may require writting special kernel driver or it is
El Viernes 27 Agosto 2004 20:32, Roy escribi:
HI,
I want to set interface to promisc mode and do all routing with iptables.
Is it somehow possible? as I see now kernel do not pass everything to
ipables.
Basicaly I want to ignore ethernet addess and use only ip for routing.
I suppose this
Hi,
I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This
scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive
ftp traffic to 39K perfectlyjust like i want. However, i just
noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server.
Is there something I
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 05:32, Roy wrote:
I want to set interface to promisc mode and do all routing with iptables.
You don't need to set an interface in promisc mode to do routing. You
need the clients to have you configured as a router (easily acheived via
dhcp).
Routing isn't actually done
13 matches
Mail list logo
