hi alexis,
its been a while since i did this modification to the kptd.
the diagram assumes that this a linux box doing a vpn tunnel(s). lets
assume that eth0 is facing the lan and eth1 is facing the internet and
that eth1 has one or more ipsec interfaces.
a packet from the lan comes in on eth0
Hi all :-)
I have a problem with my current configuration of ipsec. I'm using ipsec with
kernel 2.6 and racoon. I have two computers linked by wireless cards. The first
(192.168.1.1 Zeus) is connected to internet through a DSL modem and the second
(192.168.1.2 Memphis) is accessing internet
Hello guys
Idon't know if this thing has been posted before (if it was , please forgive me).
I have 7 computers at home and I want all of them to have access to the internet. In order to do that , I set up a linux router (2 network cards) as a usual router (eth0 : 82.77.69.75 - internet
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 05:19:39 -0700 (PDT), Sorin Capra wrote
$ipt -t filter -N computer1 /dev/null 21
$ipt -t filter -N computer2 /dev/null 21
$ipt -t filter -N computer3 /dev/null 21
$ipt -t filter -N computer4 /dev/null 21
$ipt -t filter -N computer5 /dev/null 21
$ipt -A FORWARD -s
hi alexis,
please do -- i'd like to see just how far off i am :-)
i've been just playing arounfd with racoon instead of freeswan --
totally different animal ...
cheers
charles
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 16:39, Alexis wrote:
Thanks again, this is _really_ enough info, ill do a lab and test this, I
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 08:21:21 -0700 (PDT), Sorin Capra wrote
Thank you for the quick reply
It works now , but I still have one question : why didn't it work before
(in FORWARD) ? It should have worked , shouldn't it ?
1) Have you tried to do:
iptables -t filter -L -nv
and check if
Hi,
I recommend you to use the following script:
#!/bin/sh
# Deleting all existing rules in all chains
# and theleting user created chains
iptables -t nat -F
iptables -t filter -F
iptables -t mangle -F
iptables -t nat -X
iptables -t filter -X
