Re: [LARTC] mark

2004-10-26 Thread Tomasz Chilinski
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:43:43 -0200, James Lista wrote folks, Hello James. when marking a packet to band control , what is the diffent between: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m p2p --p2p all -j CONNMARK --set-mark $P2P_MARK iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark $P2P_MARK

[LARTC] kernel oops, then tc not working

2004-10-26 Thread nuclearcat
Hello LARTC. Sorry, that i am not professional to do bugreports... but Kernel vanilla 2.6.9 What else info need? First one Oct 24 19:26:59 Gerasimos5 kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00100100 Oct 24 19:26:59 Gerasimos5 kernel: printing eip: Oct 24 19:26:59

Re: [LARTC] graphics HTB

2004-10-26 Thread Andreas Klauer
Am Tuesday 26 October 2004 16:16 schrieb emo terziev: Hi is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with classes but for HTB Based on show.pl: http://www.metamorpher.de/files/tc-graph.pl Example graph: http://www.metamorpher.de/files/fairnat.png (big!) Use at your own risk

Re: [LARTC] graphics HTB

2004-10-26 Thread Jason Boxman
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 11:55, Andreas Klauer wrote: Am Tuesday 26 October 2004 16:16 schrieb emo terziev: Hi is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with classes but for HTB Based on show.pl: http://www.metamorpher.de/files/tc-graph.pl Example graph:

[LARTC] ip route nat madness.

2004-10-26 Thread Петр Волков
Hello list. I may become crazy without your help. I'm not nubie, but... All worked with 2.4 kernel, but when I have to move to 2.6.8.1 it's not. I'm using ip route nat 231.222.222.111 via 172.16.1.13 to substitute inet address 231.222.222.111 on 172.16.1.13 during routing. Look at the output:

[LARTC] Policing

2004-10-26 Thread ms419
My attempts to configure policing are stopping incoming traffic all together. From the LARTC HOWTO, I gather that the following lines should limit incoming traffic on eth0 to 32kbit by dropping packets above this threshold: tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0

Re: [LARTC] tc philosophy, will this work?

2004-10-26 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 25 October 2004 21:05, Jakub Gazik wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, I just want to help my friend who needs a tc solution with fairness to hosts on a 512K/s DSL line, but few of them should be restricted to 64K/s I thought about htb + esfq (sfq with ip based fairness, not connection)

[LARTC] about ARP replies

2004-10-26 Thread Damjan
I have a Linux router with two ethernet cards, one connected via a wireless bridge (WAN), and the other to the customers network(LAN). The ip address on the LAN side I can't control, because it must be part of customers network. The router offcourse does NAT so I never care what the LAN ip address

[LARTC] wonder shaper

2004-10-26 Thread Vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi there, what's difference between wonder shaper and htb/tc? http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ please advice. regards, /vicky -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [LARTC] Limit traffic that use to download a file

2004-10-26 Thread Rinto Exandy
Dear All, Thank you for the suggestion, I use iptables connbytes facility to mark large packet, and it' works great. Sincerely, Rinto Exandi ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

[LARTC] Traffic Control Diagnostic Graphing Utility

2004-10-26 Thread Jason Boxman
I wrote a Perl script to poll `tc` for traffic control statistics (just bytes presently) for leaf qdiscs. The information is fed to either RRDTool or Munin[2], depending on what parameter is passed to the script. If the option for a RRD database is used, graphs[3][4] are written to disk for