On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:43:43 -0200, James Lista wrote
folks,
Hello James.
when marking a packet to band control , what is the diffent between:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m p2p --p2p all -j CONNMARK --set-mark
$P2P_MARK
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark $P2P_MARK
Hello LARTC.
Sorry, that i am not professional to do bugreports... but
Kernel vanilla 2.6.9
What else info need?
First one
Oct 24 19:26:59 Gerasimos5 kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 00100100
Oct 24 19:26:59 Gerasimos5 kernel: printing eip:
Oct 24 19:26:59
Am Tuesday 26 October 2004 16:16 schrieb emo terziev:
Hi
is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with
classes but for HTB
Based on show.pl:
http://www.metamorpher.de/files/tc-graph.pl
Example graph:
http://www.metamorpher.de/files/fairnat.png (big!)
Use at your own risk
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 11:55, Andreas Klauer wrote:
Am Tuesday 26 October 2004 16:16 schrieb emo terziev:
Hi
is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with
classes but for HTB
Based on show.pl:
http://www.metamorpher.de/files/tc-graph.pl
Example graph:
Hello list.
I may become crazy without your help. I'm not nubie, but...
All worked with 2.4 kernel, but when I have to move to 2.6.8.1 it's not.
I'm using ip route nat 231.222.222.111 via 172.16.1.13 to substitute inet address
231.222.222.111 on 172.16.1.13 during routing. Look at the output:
My attempts to configure policing are stopping incoming traffic all
together.
From the LARTC HOWTO, I gather that the following lines should limit
incoming traffic on eth0 to 32kbit by dropping packets above this
threshold:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0
On Monday 25 October 2004 21:05, Jakub Gazik wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, I just want to help my friend who needs a tc
solution with fairness to hosts on a 512K/s DSL line, but few of them
should be restricted to 64K/s
I thought about htb + esfq (sfq with ip based fairness, not connection)
I have a Linux router with two ethernet cards, one connected via
a wireless bridge (WAN), and the other to the customers network(LAN).
The ip address on the LAN side I can't control, because it must be part
of customers network. The router offcourse does NAT so I never care what
the LAN ip address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi there,
what's difference between wonder shaper and htb/tc?
http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
please advice.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Dear All,
Thank you for the suggestion, I use iptables connbytes facility to
mark large packet, and it' works great.
Sincerely,
Rinto Exandi
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
I wrote a Perl script to poll `tc` for traffic control statistics (just bytes
presently) for leaf qdiscs. The information is fed to either RRDTool or
Munin[2], depending on what parameter is passed to the script. If the option
for a RRD database is used, graphs[3][4] are written to disk for
11 matches
Mail list logo