[LARTC] Confuse, putting packets in wrong mangle table.

Folks, I am a little bit confuse in how to put these packets into correct mangle table for traffic shaping. This is what i ve planned to do: - - - - :eth0 [ LINUX-BOX ] eth1: - - - - Let say: eth0: 220.100.1.1 eth1: 192.168.1.1 eth1:1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.0/24 get natted into 220.100.1.1 befo

Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

Are you sure we do care about priorities of inner classes? It seems for me that you do not even have this entry in the memory structure in case of inner class - only leaf classes have prios. Dmitry On Tuesday 18 January 2005 17:47, "sanjeev ravindran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for

Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

Thank you for ur response, Actually I too found the same in user guide of htb... however i was bit confused about the priority of different classes now things are clear... thanks again sanjeev - Original Message - From: "Tóth Nándor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Sub

[LARTC] Archives and question

Hello-- I am brand new to this list. I've been using a pre-packaged subset of Linux that comes with an application called IPCop. (If you're unfamiliar with IPCop, I think it's a wonderful, easy-to-use firewall application that will run on pretty low-end hardware.) But otherwise I'm pretty much a

Re: [LARTC] failover works - but balancing does not

Hi, Can I know how is your failover works? Any additional scripts? Regards, ro0ot roderick tapang wrote: here's the setup (two dsl - same provider) +-> link1 LAN- linux box --| |--internet +-> link2 the

[LARTC] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] iproute2 + iptables - match the connection time or packets sent/recieved

- Original Message - From: "Jason Boxman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:50 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] iproute2 + iptables - match the connection time or packets sent/recieved > On Monday 17 January 2005 08:48, Iosif Peterfi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > All i want

Re: [LARTC] iproute2 + iptables - match the connection time or packets sent/recieved

- Original Message - From: "Jason Boxman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:50 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] iproute2 + iptables - match the connection time or packets sent/recieved > On Monday 17 January 2005 08:48, Iosif Peterfi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > All i want

Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

Hi! sanjeev ravindran wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum priority? Any help is most appreciated, Thanks in advance, Sanjeev http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm#prio "Priorizing

Re: [LARTC] failover works - but balancing does not

Hi! roderick tapang wrote: here's the setup (two dsl - same provider) +-> link1 LAN- linux box --| |--internet +-> link2 the setup is ok in terms of the failover requirement. the other link takes over w