Re: [LARTC] can't understand strange PRIO behaviour

2005-02-01 Thread Andreas Klauer
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 04:46, Viktor Horvath wrote: > tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 2 priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > # Create the two PRIO sub-qdiscs > tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 10: prio bands 2 priomap 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > tc qdisc

Re: [LARTC] can't understand strange PRIO behaviour

2005-02-01 Thread Jason Boxman
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 22:46, Viktor Horvath wrote: > Hello everybody, > > sorry for bothering you, but after some hours, I'm stuck. I'm living in > a student's foundation where I want to connect lots of people to a tiny > DSL link. We have exactly four types of traffic. We want a really hard

[LARTC] can't understand strange PRIO behaviour

2005-02-01 Thread Viktor Horvath
Hello everybody, sorry for bothering you, but after some hours, I'm stuck. I'm living in a student's foundation where I want to connect lots of people to a tiny DSL link. We have exactly four types of traffic. We want a really hard PRIO solution (as I promised to someone that group X will only use

[LARTC] cross compiling iproute2

2005-02-01 Thread js si
i have to cross compile iproute2 for power pc. i am completely new to cross compiling and would appreciate any help. thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com

Re: [LARTC] Sessionbased traffic on NANO?

2005-02-01 Thread Tóth Nándor
Hi! Steen Suder wrote: I use the wellknown nano setup (by Christoph Simon) on a few sites with success. From time to time a user approaches me with problems that seems to originate from the fact that only trafic to the samt DST IP on the net will get out the same link. The problem happens with

[LARTC] Sessionbased traffic on NANO?

2005-02-01 Thread Steen Suder
I use the wellknown nano setup (by Christoph Simon) on a few sites with success. From time to time a user approaches me with problems that seems to originate from the fact that only trafic to the samt DST IP on the net will get out the same link. The problem happens with traffic from applicati

Re: [LARTC] combining fw and u32

2005-02-01 Thread richard lucassen
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:18:14 +0200 (EET) "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As this machine will be upgraded in the coming months, I'll put > > 2.6.11 on it. And which version do you call "new iproute2"? > > If you download it _now_, you'll be ok. :) Of course :-) But as

Re: [LARTC] combining fw and u32

2005-02-01 Thread Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
As this machine will be upgraded in the coming months, I'll put 2.6.11 on it. And which version do you call "new iproute2"? If you download it _now_, you'll be ok. :) R. -- ___ Recursion: see recursion +

Re: [LARTC] combining fw and u32

2005-02-01 Thread richard lucassen
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:58:46 +0200 (EET) "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 > > selectors? > > http://kernel.umbrella.ro if you don't have 2.6.11-rc1. > If you have the latest iproute2 you can do: > > # send

Re: [LARTC] combining fw and u32

2005-02-01 Thread Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, richard lucassen wrote: Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. http://kernel.umbrella.ro if you don't have 2.6.11-rc1. If you have the latest iproute2 you can do: # send a packet with mark 3 and tcp with dport >= 1024 to 1:50 tc fil

[LARTC] combining fw and u32

2005-02-01 Thread richard lucassen
Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. -- ___ Recursion: see recursion +--+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht

[LARTC] multiple defaults

2005-02-01 Thread richard lucassen
I have 1 100MB NIC with two 2MB-subnets trough a router behind it. I'd like to create multiple default classes: 1: + |\_ 1:10 default, ceiling 10kbit, rate 96000kbit | |\_ 1:11 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 2048kbit || ||\_1:110 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 1536kbit | \_1:111

Re: [LARTC] How to bond pppoe links

2005-02-01 Thread diab
D> I have three ADSL lines that I'd like to use as one big pipe to the D> internet. The ADSL service works by establishing a pppoe connection (the D> ADSL "modem" is a bridge), and each pppoe interface gets its own IP D> address. D> This means I'd have to have 4 ethernet interfaces (3 for each D>

Re: [LARTC] How to bond pppoe links

2005-02-01 Thread Rene Gallati
Damjan wrote: I have three ADSL lines that I'd like to use as one big pipe to the internet. The ADSL service works by establishing a pppoe connection (the ADSL "modem" is a bridge), and each pppoe interface gets its own IP address. This means I'd have to have 4 ethernet interfaces (3 for each of t