[LARTC] Adding dsmark qdisc fails

2005-03-20 Thread Tero Saarni
I'm trying to configure dsmark qdisc on 2.6.11.4 user mode linux and tc from iproute2-2.6.11-050314. I think I have some mismatch in my setup since adding dsmark qdisc fails *unless* I specify set_tc_index argument which I believe should be optional: # tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark

[LARTC] cbq configuration is needed

2005-03-20 Thread Alaios
Hi i need a cbq configuration that works and drops packets if the flow exceeds an amount of data.. Do u have any configuration that drops packets...? My cbq configuraion doesnt drop packets... The traffic use the correct class but seems that tha cbq is not able to control correct the flow

Re: [LARTC] Adding dsmark qdisc fails

2005-03-20 Thread Patrick McHardy
Tero Saarni wrote: I'm trying to configure dsmark qdisc on 2.6.11.4 user mode linux and tc from iproute2-2.6.11-050314. I think I have some mismatch in my setup since adding dsmark qdisc fails *unless* I specify set_tc_index argument which I believe should be optional: # tc qdisc add dev eth1

Re: [LARTC] Adding dsmark qdisc fails

2005-03-20 Thread Thomas Graf
* Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-20 16:15 # tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 8 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Mar 20 13:00:50 user user.debug kernel: dsmark_init(sch a0bb3ae0,[qdisc a0bb3b60],opt ) It is caused by this patch, the transformation

Re: [LARTC] Adding dsmark qdisc fails

2005-03-20 Thread Tero Saarni
From: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] My patch is right but discovered a quite more serious bug in the generic routing attribute handling. nlmsg_len is not aligned to RTA_ALIGNTO if the data length of the attribute did not have this alignment itself. The fact that the addition of the next attribute

[LARTC] cbq configuration is needed

2005-03-20 Thread Alaios
Hi i need a cbq configuration that works and drops packets if the flow exceeds an amount of data.. Do u have any configuration that drops packets...? My cbq configuraion doesnt drop packets... The traffic uses the correct class but seems that the cbq is not able to control correct the flow

Re: [LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-20 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. Drag0n wrote: been sending virii e-mails, and no other e-mails, its an easy block. If he was actualy on this list, he would have responded to this thread in his own defense. Don't forget that some people don't read their mails every day. Some are enjoying the weekend, others are on holidays,