--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROT
I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually posted
a full config on the list a while ago but didn't get any answers.
The problem is that traffic doesn't get into the user classes (~150) when I
associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I don
Marcus,
I'm a little confused. Downstream is 1mbit and upstream is 128kbit but the root limit
in your code is 1mbit. Surely this could be the cause of your problem?
Regards
Brian
On 23 Mar 2005 at 14:33, Marcus Fritzsch wrote:
> ~ 27 # shapiung class of root --> not more than 1mbit b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there!
Well, as an exercise, I try 'simulating' an adsl link (just the speed ;o))
with a GRE tunnel and HTB for bandwidth limiting. Typically in germany
adsl has about 1024kbit downstream and 128kbits upstream (yes, there are
others ;) but these are
IMO, you have to --limit for each of the computer separately (1 chain
for each IP address), otherwise you will block both the instruder and
the legitimate users.
Perhaps the better solution is to install an IDS and completely block
instruder, wait until he/she contacts you and ask for worm remo
Perhaps someone will help me on this :-
I have read a lot of examples of syn flood protect on the INPUT chain.
That I have no question at all.
I wonder if it make sense to perform syn flood protection
at the FORWARD chain ? If packets are originated from a
LAN worm, and are not targetted at the
