I'm using the patch for dummy as an imq replacement that Jamal posted a
little while back.
I've tried to do the same thing on an egress qdisc to try to limit outbound
speed and still had no luck. My u32 filters work fine, but are not enough
for our setup here.
Here's what I've got...
export TC=
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Troy Caldwell wrote:
Can someone verify that using fw as a filter in iproute2-2.6.11-050330 is
broken. Doesn't seem to work in any case and I saw an earlier post that
would lead me to believe this is the case. If so does anyone have a
temporary fix?
Thanks,
Troy
__
Can someone verify that using fw as a filter in iproute2-2.6.11-050330 is
broken. Doesn't seem to work in any case and I saw an earlier post that
would lead me to believe this is the case. If so does anyone have a
temporary fix?
Thanks,
Troy
___
LARTC
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROT
SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield™ Alert
The email server has discovered a problem with the following email.
Please note that the sender of the email will not be
notified with this message.
> More information :
Date/Time sent: 08 Apr 2005 14:34:17
Subject line: [LARTC] Re:
From: [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
I have met the problem: when I use the shaping discipline
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:2 tbf latency 50ms burst 1450 rate 50kbit
one of my application (namely, "aMule") starts leaving sockets in
"CLOSING" state. These sockets accumulate and do not disappear.
Eventually I have so many of t
Emcast has the “good” idea to
set the default ttl to 1. So be careful !!!
Emcast –t 2 and it passes the router…
I hope nobody else will lose so much time
!
Bye
Yoann
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allain Yoann
Sent: vendredi 8 avril 2005 15:
I want to create a socket that will send packets with a DS field
different than 0x00.
I want to change 6 DSCP bits and not the 4 bytes of TOS
Can it be done at all with setsockopt() ?
Regards,
Arshad Siddiqui
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.
Hello.
I’m new to this list.
I’m trying to set up multicast routing between
two networks:
Internet
^
|
Windows box
|
|
UserMod
Em Sex, 2005-04-08 às 11:06 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
Hy people and Corey
> You might have come across documents describing ingress shaping, which
> deals with traffic coming into an interface rather than the usual
> methods of shaping traffic as it leaves an interface.
Yes a lot of docu
Hi Jandre Olivier,
1. although the rate is 32Kbit, the ceil is also 32Kbit; you will get
very close 32Kbit, but no more that 32Kbit.
2. The kernel calculates rate based on the packet size, not payload
length. But your client, calculates rate based on the payload length.
If the traffic pattern is
Hi Guys,
I have a little problem i dont understand why its happening,
Initially i thought it was a network problem, but then i made a
crossover between me and the server and shaped on that interface with as
minimal as possible config
this my test:
$TC qdisc add dev $INTERFACE root handle 1: htb
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROT
SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield™ Alert
The email server has discovered a problem with the following email.
Please note that the sender of the email will not be
notified with this message.
> More information :
Date/Time sent: 08 Apr 2005 05:11:48
Subject line: [LARTC] Re:
From: [EMAIL PROT
14 matches
Mail list logo
