Title: AW: AW: [LARTC] Activate ingress policies on suse enterprise server 9
Good Morning,
Thanks for your hint, now I can see the dropped packages!
But it is only working for port 8080 why not for port 8099??
(If you need some indices please let me know)
Thanks
Gernot
=== tc filter - based on iptables - MAC fw marking not
working ==
DEV="eth1"
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
600kbps ceil 3276800kbit
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:15 htb rate
3kbps prio 4
tc class add dev $DEV
Even if we keep this email in the mailing list i don't see any
interest to forward "Suspicious attachment" notifications to everyone.
Erwan Le Doeuff
Project Manager of rcc project QoS HTB Power tool
http://www.rcc-project.net
removing this person could be a great idea!
Erwan Le Doeuff
Project Manager of rcc project QoS HTB Power tool
http://www.rcc-project.net
On 4/18/05, <> wrote:
> --
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROT
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROT
SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield™ Alert
The email server has discovered a problem with the following email.
Please note that the sender of the email will not be
notified with this message.
> More information :
Date/Time sent: 18 Apr 2005 16:38:49
Subject line: [LARTC] Re:
From: [EMAIL PROT
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
The following message will not be delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROT
Grames Gernot wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response,
.)Okay I tried your suggestion for my port 8099 and nothing happened:
The tcp ip information goes from a firewall to my port 8099 and this port is
than routed to the original 8080, I do that because I don`t want to dirturb
my port 8080.
But it
Title: AW: [LARTC] Activate ingress policies on suse enterprise server 9
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response,
.)Okay I tried your suggestion for my port 8099 and nothing happened:
The tcp ip information goes from a firewall to my port 8099 and this port is than routed to the origi
Alaios wrote:
thx for your answer... i use the 2.6.10 vanilla
kernel.. i have downloaded two weeks ago the latest
iproute2.
I have installed tbf with the following command
$tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 2:1 tbf rate $EF_RATE
burst $EF_BURST mtu $EF_MTU limit $EF_LIMIT
and i have got the results usin
Marcin Sura wrote:
Hi
I have Linux box (Debian) that acting as a bridge.
Eth0 and Eth1 are bridged (br0).
Br0 have public IP.
Eth0 connects to the internet.
Eth1 connect to servers in DMZ (with public IPs).
Eth2 connects my Lan (192.168.1.0/24).
My connections is 2Mbit/2Mbit.
I'
Grames Gernot wrote:
Hi,
what is needed to activate ingress policies for enterprise server 9!
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent : protocol ip u32 match ip dport 8099
0x police rate 1kbit burst 1kbit mtu 1 drop flowid :1
I get a memory allocation error if I try t
Hi,
what is needed to
activate ingress policies for enterprise server 9!
My current loaded
modules:
in the
attachments
my kernel:
Linux linux 2.6.5-7.97-smp #1 SMP Fri Jul 2 14:21:59 UTC 2004
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
So you can see the
module sch_ingress is loaded and
> Hi
Hi!
>
> Couple months ago I started to have a strange problem with HTB.
> My setup is Fedora Core 2 + Pentium 2 233 + 128 MB of ram and its
> serving as a router.
> For some time since going to kernel 2.6 my HTB QoS Stalls for couple
> seconds, every couple minutes. If the connection load i
Me too. I've think the problem started after I use kernel 2.6.8.1. IfI good remember I doesn't have this problem with
2.6.7. The new thing in2.6.8.1 was the QoS clock source (or similar). I use here CPU cyclecounter because I have a fast uplink (1 Gbps). I think maybe this can bethe source of th
Which tool (can be windows also) can i use to test the ingress filter (tcpip
load generator or something else), and set the packet length size and so on!
Try taking a look at the Packet Generator in the Linux kernel under "Network Testing"
under "Networking Options" (...Networking Options, Network
Hi,I have set a ingress filter to
reduce the inbound traffic on one specificport and also i check the packages
(buffer).No i want to test the ingress filter if it is working how i a
expect.Which tool (can be windows also) can i use to test the ingress
filter (tcpipload generator or som
QoS on eth0 works fine for DMZ, but is there a possibility to doing
QoS on eth0 based on private IPs ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) ?
Are you wanting to QoS inbound or outbound traffic to and from your private
IPs? This should be possible on for inbound on your eth2 interface. You might
have to use IMQ
19 matches
Mail list logo