Re: [LARTC] Suspicious Attachment

Hi. erwan le doeuff wrote: Even if we keep this email in the mailing list i don't see any interest to forward Suspicious attachment notifications to everyone. I agree, but I also see no reason to have this discussion arising over and over again. Local filtering should do the trick until that

Re[2]: [LARTC] Suspicious Attachment

Dear, erwan. You wrote Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 6:50:57 AM: If maillist admins is not looking there, great idea can be report to this wilson ISP, admins, chiefs and etc. about viruses he sending, that he destroying reputation of his company, ... :) Let's say he trying to do terrorism, infect

Re: Re[2]: [LARTC] Suspicious Attachment

sorry to say -- but did you see the film cast away -- the volleyball --named wilson. On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:36 +0300, nuclearcat wrote: Dear, erwan. You wrote Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 6:50:57 AM: If maillist admins is not looking there, great idea can be report to this wilson ISP,

[LARTC] SQLiaison E-Mail Virus Alert

SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield Alert The email server has discovered a problem with the following email. Please note that the sender of the email will not be notified with this message. More information : Date/Time sent: 19 Apr 2005 14:50:28 Subject line: [LARTC] Re: From: [EMAIL

Re: AW: AW: [LARTC] Activate ingress policies on suse enterprise serv er 9

Grames Gernot wrote: Good Morning, Thanks for your hint, now I can see the dropped packages! But it is only working for port 8080 why not for port 8099?? (If you need some indices please let me know) I don't know why it should work for 8080 and not 8099 - I don't think I quite understand your

Re: [LARTC] tc filter - based on iptables - MAC - MARK not working - altough marking on ip src, dst address works

Daniel Dafoe wrote: === tc filter - based on iptables - MAC fw marking not working == DEV=eth1 snip Tried several times: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root eth0? iptables src MAC works for me with 1.3.1 - can you see the rule and counters matching with iptables -L -vnt mangle? Andy.

Re: [LARTC] HTB stalling

Krystian Antoni wrote: Hi Couple months ago I started to have a strange problem with HTB. My setup is Fedora Core 2 + Pentium 2 233 + 128 MB of ram and its serving as a router. For some time since going to kernel 2.6 my HTB QoS Stalls for couple seconds, every couple minutes. If the connection

[LARTC] Strange pings.

Hi. The configuration script is at the bottom. My configuration looks similar to this: imq0 | 1:1 (12mbit) | 1:2 (10mbit) | 3:0 | 3:1 (256kbit) / \ 3:2 3:3 icmp (rest) both 3:2 and 3:3 have rate 1kbit ceil 256kbit Icmp bucklet have priority