Re: [LARTC] deleting tc rules

2005-04-20 Thread Taylor Grant
Martin, did you mean to say that when you delete handle 104: (tc filter del dev eth0 parent 2:22 handle 104: protocol ip prio 5 u32 divisor 256) you loose all your shaping for 10.0.0.28/30 as well? B/c from what you have written "...Here there is no error but all filter rules is deleted also fi

[LARTC] deleting tc rules

2005-04-20 Thread Martin Schiøtz
Hi I'm doing traffic shaping with tc on '10.0.0.0/30' and '10.0.0.28/30'. I want to delete part of shaping rules on the fly. (see my configuration at the end of this mail) I wan't to delete the shaping for '10.0.0.0/30' on the fly while still keeping the shaping for part '10.0.0.28/30' running.

Re: [LARTC] A question.

2005-04-20 Thread Taylor, Grant
Rene I have a list of questions for you: 1) Can we get a simple layout of your network? 2) Are you wanting to set a bandwidth limit on how much traffic each individual computer in your network can send out to the world (outbound tc filter)? 3) Are you wanting to set a bandwidth limit on how mu

Re: [SPAM] AW: AW: AW: [LARTC] Activate ingress policies on suse enterprise serv er 9

2005-04-20 Thread Taylor, Grant
Keep in mind that TC only controls traffic that is outbound from a system. If you are wanting to TC traffic coming in to your system you will need to look at something like IMQ. IMQ as I understand it is like a virtual device that traffic comes in to and is then resend out of back in to your s

[LARTC] SQLiaison E-Mail Virus Alert

2005-04-20 Thread techsupport
SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield™ Alert The email server has discovered a problem with the following email. Please note that the sender of the email will not be notified with this message. > More information : Date/Time sent: 20 Apr 2005 10:17:18 Subject line: [LARTC] Re: From: [EMAIL PROT

[LARTC] A question.

2005-04-20 Thread Rene Casasola
I have a Smoothwall like firewall and proxy, I would like to establish a bandwidth I inside specify for each IP my network. But that I have been able to do it is to install the QoS to him but it is not sufficient. Somebody can help me? My English is very bad, pardon if this badly written, I had

Re: [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?

2005-04-20 Thread Radu CUGUT
OK, i've got the ideea. In conclusion if i have a simple: LAN --- router --- WAN i don't need IMQ stuff :) thanks bye -- Radu Cugut mobile: +40 742 045686 web:http://rcugut.has.it ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailma

[LARTC] SQLiaison E-Mail Virus Alert

2005-04-20 Thread techsupport
SQLiaison Mail Server: GroupShield™ Alert The email server has discovered a problem with the following email. Please note that the sender of the email will not be notified with this message. > More information : Date/Time sent: 20 Apr 2005 03:50:17 Subject line: [LARTC] Re: From: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [LARTC] tc filter - based on iptables - MAC - MARK not working - altough marking on ip src, dst address works

2005-04-20 Thread Daniel Dafoe
--- Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your input: modified DEV="eth0" indeed was a typo -- but still no luck with shaping iptables -L -vnt mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 5172K packets, 2786M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source d